0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

Hollywood Morality, Superman 2 Subversion, NATO Disintegrating [stream #79]

I introduced this livestream with a chat about Hollywood morality, and about the subversion seen in the movie Superman 2. Then I gave my monologue about NATO’s alliance disintegrating. Buy me a coffee.


For three years now, Western media have been manifesting victory over Putin’s troops in Eastern Ukraine, but so far, Russian drones flying on parts allegedly sourced from second-hand washers and dryers are dominating the battlefield. In an obvious act of revenge, Russian drones have just recently been stoking Ukrainian towns far beyond the Russian border, especially hitting the capital of Kyiv hard.

I remember when American neckbeard leftists were all changing the spelling of Kievan Chicken into Kyivan Chicken to show solidarity, but these Western manifestations haven’t materialized on any other platform but the websites of traditional media. Now, Putin’s weakness is supposedly showing by Russia’s limited support for Iran. This is a political oxymoron, since apparently, despite having nearly been defeated by the West, Russian can still supply military and financial support to foreign nations.

Meanwhile, Slovenia’s president Robert Golob has issued a plebiscite, a referendum, to ask the Slovenian people whether they want to stay in the NATO alliance, or get out. Slovenia has barely 2 million inhabitants, anyway, and they’re not ready to cough up the 5% GDP demanded of NATO allies by President Trump. Other Central- and Eastern European countries, such as Hungary (a country of 10 million) and Slovakia (a country of 5.5 million) will be keeping an eye on the Slovenian referendum. Hungary and Slovakia, too, are critical of the European Union, of NATO, and quite supportive of Russia.

Russians, for example, are helping Hungary construct a nuclear power plant, though with the help of French and German workers. Hungary also sources plenty of affordable Russian gas through the TurkStream pipeline that runs through Turkey. Hungary’s leader Viktor Orbán is a fan of Donald Trump’s, but only on the social and moral issues of immigration and Islamization. Militarily speaking, Orbán has consistently denied an interest in war with Russia. Hungary, for example, refuses to ship weapons to Ukraine, and opposes Ukraine’s acceptance into either NATO or the European Union, which would force all European men to go to war with Russia.

Eastern European nations have barely been introduced into the European Union, and already their populations are wondering whether joining the EU was a mistake. So far, the borderless union has seen skilled personnel leave for work in Germany or elsewhere in Western Europe, whereas Western corporations have colonized much of the Eastern Europe’s commercial life. Due to the arrival of Western nomads, housing and rent prices have only skyrocketed, while growing Eastern European salaries have yet failed to bring them relief from relative poverty.

Eastern Europe, of course, for a long time, belonged to the Soviet Union. The switch to Western Europe and to the North Atlantic sphere of alliances was supposed to bring Eastern Europe considerable wealth, not to be exploited by France and Germany to pay for their economic deficits. Moreover, in case of a war with Russia, Eastern Europe finds itself in the line of fire. Do you really believe Poland, for example, will be looking forward to dying for American and German corporate interests after what the Germans have done to Poland during the Second World War? They joined the EU for the money, but perhaps they will revert to the Soviet Union to save their lives.

But it’s not just small countries trying to get out from under NATO’s obligations. Romania is feeling uneasy with its NATO partnership. Spain, too, doesn’t feel like paying up the requested 5% of GDP. Italy and Greece are struggling to curb—or rather, facilitate—the unrelenting mass migration coming to Europe from North Africa and the Middle East. Recently, Cyprus has been designated a refugee hub for Gaza Palestinians driven out by Israel. Cyprus will be the new Lampedusa, a thoroughfare to ultimately get migrants onto trains toward Germany and Britain.

Considering that 70% of casualties in the Eastern Ukrainian war zone, today, in the Donbass region, now come from unmanned drones exploding in men’s faces, even the use of tanks has come under scrutiny, since drone parties flying in formations of six or seven drones, can easily target tanks who have no meaningful defenses against them, except for carrying metal bird cages to prevent drones from blasting too close to the cockpit. Still, then, the drones can hit the tank’s undercarriage and destroy its tracks. Regardless, a series of drones blowing up against tanks or other vehicles will ultimately drive their occupants out, after which remaining drones will target the humans trying to flee their burning vehicles.

There is no more honor to be found in war. War is now a human wood chipper. One might even wonder whether human lives need to be spent in battle at all, if we can just pit our drones against each other and call it a day.

Russia is winning the drone war, and Putin’s nation is also casually producing over three time the weapons, bombs, and vehicles the EU nations are currently producing. If there were lessons to be learned from the Second World War, when the German armies failed to capture Stalingrad, and were then driven back by the Red Army, it’s that the Soviets were simply out-producing the Germans in terms of weapons, bullets, and bombs. The outcome of war isn’t always decided by sheer explosive might, but in the case of the present European Union, I wouldn’t count on any military genius outsmarting the Russians.

The EU’s best idea, to date, has been to hit Russia with more sanctions. The idea came from George Soros, the founder of the Soros Open Society Foundations, who once wrote, in an article published on Project Syndicate, that Russia was just a “gas station” with an economy no greater than that of Spain’s. The comparison ends there, since the vast Russian land mass contains enough raw materials and cheap labor to sustain a full-frontal war on the West for at least another 100 years, whereas Spain is largely a desert that would run out of fresh water within a week. Spain could never defend itself against Russia alone.

Never mind that the so-called Russian sanctions have barely dented Russia’s economy, but have rather put Europe’s biggest industry, Germany’s, in a painful position. No longer able to run on cheap Russian gas and oil, Germany has been forced to make itself dependent on American liquid natural gas, and on gas from Qatar. This switch from an Orthodox Christian supplier to a fundamentalist Islamic supplier of fossil energy has, of course, brought with it stark cultural change. It is the real reason that Europe must open its borders to Islamic immigration, namely to win contracts with the Arabs.

This switch from Russian to Arab oil was already announced in 1975 in a document called the Strasbourg Resolutions. It came after the oil boycotts of 1973, which temporarily shut down North-Western Europe’s modern industry. In a secret deal with the Arabs, Europe agreed to start promoting Islamic culture, and to, at least publicly, denounce Israel. In practice, European nations have remained staunch supporters of Israel, while, at the same time, allowing mass migration of Islamic immigrants, believing they could somehow integrate Islam and create a mellowed European version of Islam.

This hasn’t worked out, very well, has it? We’ve imported debilitating levels of foreign rape and crime, to the point where young White women in their 20s are now turning to the far-right, demanding mass deportations. If Europe has to become Islamic and diverse to beat Russia, then we’ve already lost.

The Russian sanctions have backfired. Putin, according to Western news sources, has instructed his generals to deal to Europe the blow Europe intended for Russia, namely, to destroy Europe economically. After all, if Russia is just a gas station, then Europe is just a museum. I believe it entirely within the realm of possibilities that Russia will succeed in draining Europe’s resources in a protracted war of attrition. Europe will slowly bleed itself dry financially, whereas Russia will slowly gain strength by drinking our blood.

I say this because I think it reasonable that the United States is happily throwing Europe under the bus. Europe may be used to slow Russia down, while the USA prepares for its new future as an Afro-Indian technocracy. Where will that leave White people when Europe turns into an Islamic third world hellscape, and the USA turns into another India? We might almost be better off moving to Eastern Europe. As with the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Eastern Byzantine Empire lived on.

If Western Europe goes down, Eastern Europe might be the only place on Earth to remain relatively White and Christian.

Discussion about this video