It is disingenuous to say that the migration of large groups of strangers into another’s settled society is a phenomenon of all ages. No, modern mass migration is abnormal. We have never seen this before.
People have always lived as migratory groups, as nomadic pastoralists, or as hunters following herds and seasonal fruit crops, but throughout human history and prehistory, most migrations involved small groups of relatives moving away from other families. They were not moving toward each other.
People simply didn’t live with strangers. At most, we lived as clans of no more than 150 people, and in many cases barely 12, all of them relatives and their spouses and children. We certainly never moved into other people’s yurt tents and teepees, unless that was the outcome of a war. There was simply no reason to impose oneself onto others, since vast and fertile, unexplored lands always lay just beyond the horizon.
When conflicts arose—and they often arose—either between groups of strangers vying for the same natural riches, or between groups of relatives, i.e., different sides of the family now turned into rivals, the resolution was always that one group would pack up and migrate away, into uninhabited land.
If one such related group of people, a family clan, stumbled upon a particularly fertile strip of land, they would settle there for as long as the riches lasted. It made sense to try and protect access to these resources, such as wild herds or crop fields, from others who might find them appealing, as well.
Through the reproductive success of having many children, such fertile regions very quickly became overpopulated with one’s own kind. It made no sense, therefore, to invite others in for the sake of diversity. Why would you surrender what you have found to others who will take it from you?
Resource Protection
Over time, the need for protection of the natural resources under one’s control led to the development of the first human settlements and the earliest civilizations. Survival demanded that humans developed skill at controlling land, crops, water, shelter, animals, and even other people.
Some early groups of humans specialized in capturing herds, in order to domesticate them as pastoralists, usually in the more unpredictable areas of our planet where agriculture wasn’t possible, such as the steppe lands of Eurasia where many of our White ancestors hail from. These pastoralist races of people usually developed into aggressive warrior clans, for they had to defend their mobile assets, which could be stolen overnight, by hand.
Other groups of humans learned to cultivate areas of land meant for growing crops. But if you spent decades of your life removing tree stumps and rocks to make your soil fertile, would you surrender the fruits of your hard labor to whomever arrived at your door from faraway lands? Of course not. Even agricultural peoples had to deal with thieves stealing their supplies and equipment, or their grain stores, and so agricultural societies, since they can produce larger but more settled populations, developed specialized standing armies protecting their lands and borders.
Cities tended to start out as merchant hubs for doing trade with different peoples via land or water. Consider cities early warehouses where both people and goods could be stored for trade or profit. Indeed, the earliest city-states of Mesopotamia regularly captured wandering hunters and gatherers from the surrounding territories in order to enslave them in sweatshops, to make their captives produce clothing or apparel for wealthier, often distant customers.
As sources of material wealth, city-states and their elites logically developed a need for defending their wealth, and that’s why early cities developed behind tall city walls, namely to keep their slaves in, and to keep roving bands of robbers out. Soon, the competition between different merchant towns over the control of a region’s shared resources and people saw the birth of larger-scale military warfare, and the development of the first nation-states.
As has always been the case throughout human history, cooperation didn’t always make sense. If 12 people could defend their resources, they’d all live. But if 150 more arrived, they’d all starve together. Cooperation only works when resources aren’t constrained. That’s why most of human history is a history of conflict and greed.
Australia
The great migrations of the White Europeans since the modern Colonial Age still largely saw people migrating into empty lands, not into others’ pre-established societies. When the Anglo settled in Australia, they settled in the southernmost regions. That’s where they built their cities such as Canberra, Sydney, or Melbourne. But these regions were largely uninhabited. The darker-skinned aboriginals were living in the hotter desert territories of the North.
The Maori people of New Zealand arrived there around the 13th century AD from Polynesia. The reason no one complains about them is because they were the first arrivals. But surely, they can’t be racist now, right? So anyone can join their inclusive, multicultural, open border society, right?
It were the Aboriginals of Australia who, later, after the Whites had built their new country of Australia, which was named so by White people, started migrating into White people’s farmlands. The Aboriginal incursions into White territories presented a real pest. As hunter-gatherers who hadn’t domesticated animals, Aboriginals began killing and eating White people’s farm animals. They started robbing farmers’ croplands. It was for this reason that the Whites of Australia got into a conflict with the Northern natives and began sterilizing them.
South Africa
When Dutch explorers settled along the coastlines of Southern Africa’s cape, for the purpose of supplying ships along the sea trade routes from Europe to India, they settled there on empty land. The coastal regions of South Africa were uninhabited. Not even the Khoi-San were living there. The nearest people to be found were living at least 800 miles further inland.
As in the case of Australia, it were the blacks who eventually migrated into the White settlement. Attracted by the lure of an easier life, the Bantu blacks of Western Africa, murdering and pillaging their way through Central Africa, later arrived to Africa’s most economically prosperous zone, White South Africa. And through sheer fecundity, these Bantu blacks, who would also be shipped to the Americas as slaves, soon took over, even driving out and killing other groups of blacks.
The Afrikaner people had spent centuries building their own farms by cultivating the land. Whites hadn’t stolen anything, since blacks hadn’t built anything.
These invasive black racists, the Bantu peoples of Western Africa, who had also started the black slave trade in Ghana before handing it over to the Arabs, now rule the ANC party. These black communists have effectively stolen South Africa from the Whites that built it, to the point that the White South Africans are now looking to migrate away from these black colonizers, by transplanting themselves to Australia, Russia, the USA, or perhaps back to Europe.
South and Central America
The story of the Americas, too, has been rewritten into a story of evil White men. Those stories insist that Europeans brought germs and viruses over to the Americas that killed off the locals. That idea is entirely false. No evidence has ever been provided proving European germs killed the natives of the Americas.
In reality, the first Europeans to arrive to Latin and Central America failed to build permanent settlements and were driven back out. The lands of the Incas, Mayas, and Aztecs were densely populated and well-organized, for indeed, the locals had established elaborate, large-scale civilizations.
Think, for example, of the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Meso-America. By the thirteenth century, however, and we’re talking about a time at least 200 years before the first Europeans arrived, this massive civilization had collapsed all on its own, without any European involvement.
Why did Teotihuacan collapse, then, if germs didn’t kill them? That civilization died, because of overpopulation and because of its people’s inability to overcome technological challenges to continued population growth.
Come to think of it, it’s similar to what we are now witnessing in Europe. We have reached our limits to growth, too. Our native populations have been seeing a numerical decline since the 1990s. If nothing is done, we will have disappeared before the end of this century just like the people of Teotihuacan.
When Europeans first arrived to Latin America, they described vast lands littered with towns and cities full of people. When Europeans returned a full century later, however, they found the same towns abandoned and already overgrown by plants, swallowed by the jungle. But now, because local civilization had receded, the Spanish conquistadors were able to start taking over the remnants of a lost society.
The story that Europeans killed all the natives with their diseases and rifles is a fabrication of history that Southern Americans love hearing, because the truth of their past is a much more shameful story of failure and mismanagement. The natives of the Americas didn’t die because of Europeans. They died of starvation due to the collapse of their food supply.
Vikings in North America
The first Europeans to arrive in North America were initially also repelled by the natives. They were the Viking descendants of Erik the Red and his son Leif Eriksson. Not only did their crews reach Vinland, or modern-day Eastern Canada, the Viking sagas tell of men reaching as far south as what is presently the USA. There is a possibility that one group of Vikings, lost in a storm, even reached the tip of today’s Eastern Mexico, namely the region of Chichén Itzá.
There, in the Temple of Warriors, we find Mayan murals depicting a group of White-skinned men, but no women, as captives of darker-skinned men. The murals show their hands tied while being led down a street, as in a procession, to meet their fate. The final image shows a golden-skinned White man with long blond hair stretched over backward on an altar with his feet and hands held down by two darker men, presumably to have his throat slit and his heart removed in a ritual sacrifice.
The Icelandic Saga of Erik the Red furthermore tells us that, at Vinland, or modern day Canada, the Vikings encountered an overwhelming force of resistance from the natives. They were the ancestors of the Inuit and/or Beothuk. The saga describes a “great crowd of boats coming down on [the Vikings] like a stream”, after which the Norsemen “were now of opinion that, though the land might be choice and good, there would be always war and terror overhanging them, from those who dwelt there before them.”
Wait, don’t we have a couple of words for this kind of attitude? What kind of welcoming committee is that? Yes, we call it racism and xenophobia! The native Americans were racist xenophobes who discriminated against White Vikings just because the color of their skin. The Vikings had done nothing wrong but present the contents of their character. They initially offered to trade with the locals, but after the bull the Viking men brought with them scared the natives, the locals ran off and returned for war, forcing the Vikings to run to their ships and abandon Vinland.
The natives of the Americas had initially violently forced the first modern Europeans out. When Europeans later returned to the Americas, they arrived on bigger ships and with better weapons, but also to find that the local American civilizations had all but exhausted themselves naturally. Continuous conflicts and tribal warfare among the natives is what ultimately killed off the native North Americans.
Europeans had nothing to do with it. Besides, at their peak before the arrival of the Europeans, North America counted about 5 to 6 million Native Americans, but today, there are 9.2 million of their kind left living in the USA, i.e., more than ever before.
The Clovis Europeans
Then there’s the matter whether these Native Americans were even the original inhabitants of the Americas. It turns out there used to be an older, more ancient people who lived there, the so-called Clovis people and their descendants who settled in North-Eastern America.
Based on their stone-chipped tools, we know that the Clovis people couldn’t have come from Siberia, as was expected. They weren’t Asiatics. In fact, the first Americans were Europeans from the Iberian peninsula of South-Western Europe. These Europeans arrived to North America during the last Ice Age, when water had receded by some 200 feet, and an ice path was formed along Iceland and Greenland between Europe and North America.
These Iberian peoples were originally North Europeans who had been forced south to escape the ice that now covered Europe halfway through today’s France. These Europeans were the first human inhabitants of the Americas, but they were brutally and savagely eradicated, to the last man, by blood-thirsted Asiatics from Siberia.
The American Clovis people and their descendants were genocided. Coincidentally, other Asiatics would later also exterminate the Viking settlers of southern Greenland. The idea that only White men were colonizing, genocidal crusaders is, of course, historically laughable. European people have been genocided more often by others than the other way around.
I wonder, though, how come there are no memorials to the genocide of these ancient Europeans who once settled the Americas, long before the Sioux, Apache, and Comanche ever even existed? Even before the Incas, Aztecs, and Mayas existed? Technically speaking, if we follow the arguments of brown people living among us today, it means the Americas belong to Europeans, since we were there first.
We didn’t steal their land, they stole it from us. What all these indigenous movements can do, we can do. We can say to the descendants of the Sioux and the Mayans, “You are living on stolen land!”
The modern Europeans, i.e., upon our Great and Long-Awaited Return, also introduced horses to the Americas, for transportation, and soon started building railroads and waterways to connect agricultural lands with the bustling new cities. When Native Americans began attacking these European settlements, such as on the island of Manahatta, Manhattan, they responded by building Wall Street—named so, because it was a wall meant to keep the warlike Indians out of civilized society.
Invasions and Conquests of Europe
Now let’s for a moment appreciate all the different times other races attempted to invade Europe, long before Europeans ever became colonisers.
Were it not the Arabs who, after conquering all of North Africa during the 7th century, which used to be a region of Mediterranean White people, set their sights on Europe? Did these Arabs not invade and conquer Spain, and Rome, and then attempt to take France as well? In the year 732 AD, the Frankish armies led by Charles Martel beat back the Umayyad legions, preventing the Islamization of Western Europe.
Likewise, the Albanian warlord Skanderbeg, once abducted by Ottoman Muslims and raised as one of them, converted back to Christianity after his escape, and with the help of his native people, he delayed the Ottoman incursion into Europe long enough to allow other forces to gear up for battle.
The Ottomans had colonized Bulgaria for over 500 years, Hungary for 150, and parts of Greece even to this day. Twice did the Ottomans attempt to take Vienna, a strategic city along the Danube, namely at the Siege of Vienna in 1529, and at the Battle of Vienna in 1683.
During the mid-thirteenth century, the Mongol Hordes of Dhenghis Khan made their way into present-day Poland, raping Christian women and pillaging Christian lands, leaving nothing but terror and devastation.
If we, Europeans, are called colonisers for building countries such as Australia or the USA, then what do we call the people who only cared to destroy Europe?
British Indo-China
It wasn’t even until the 19th century that large groups of Northern Europeans, specifically Germans, sailed out in large numbers to the USA to become its largest immigrant group, after the Anglo had settled there, taking over from the Dutch.
When these modern Europeans moved to the USA, they weren’t immigrants. They weren’t even settlers. They were transplants, for when people of the same race or of a similar culture move into each others’ settled territories, they don’t arrive as invaders or colonizers. They are moving between two regions occupied by their own people, the way a strawberry plant sometimes clones itself by turning one of its branches into a new set of roots.
Moroever, most European émigrés to Australia, South Africa, USA, New Zealand or Canada were Protestant Christians trying to escape the Catholic Church and its armies, which made them religious refugees.
How very different are the modern “migrations” of people coming to us from primitive, backward places. Modern mass migration is totally incomparable, for example, with the arrival of the British to India. The British never engulfed India with White offspring. Rather, the British merely took over the Indian leadership, as the Spanish Conquistadors did in Latin America, and ended up improving India’s economic outlook to the benefit of all who lived there.
The idea that India’s 5,000-year old civilization was somehow the wealthiest place on Earth before Europeans arrived comes from this misunderstanding that a 100 million subsistence farmers were once living there. But they produced nothing of value and exported nothing. Both pre-colonial India and China may have had the largest human populations at the time, but individually, they were so poor that their states could hardly tax the people.
Europeans achieved more in just the past 500 years than both India and China have done in 5,000. I know that’s painful to hear, especially since feelings of shame so harshly affect them, but it’s the truth. Although Europe had a relatively small population compared to Indo-China, feudal Europe generated more taxes and was thus able to muster up a greater conquering force by investing in technology.
Note, also, that Europeans never colonized China. Why not? China was just as densely populated as India, but still better organized and more developed. The Chinese were, in the end, able to ward off European conquerors.
Modern Mass Migration Is Weird
That brings me to a discussion of the weirdness of modern mass migration. Looking at the USA and Canada. The arrival of hordes of Indians, Latinos, Arabs, and Africans resembles the collapse of native American civilization centuries earlier. It’s the same for Europe, where hordes of Indians, Muslims, Arabs, and Central Africans appear to be flooding the welfare programs and the kindergartens, if not also the public pools.
What is going on here? Why aren’t Europeans and White Americans fighting back against their tormentors? Is it because Westerners somehow can’t muster up the force to fight back anymore? In this world, you only get what you can conquer, and you only keep what you can defend. Or are we, White people, somehow dying of the foreigners’ diseases and germs?
No, we’re not. Clearly, what is happening to the West today is a tale of a dying, dwindling civilization that, because of the weight of its internal collapse, its own complexity, and its loss of competence and skill, can no longer defend itself against the newcomers, just as the American natives once could no longer repel modern Europeans.
Except, there’s a twist: Europeans arriving to the Americas brought with them a superior civilization, superior technology, and advances in many other fields, but the hordes now taking over North America and Europe don’t even bother using paper to wipe their hands, or can’t even use cutlery. Above all, they appear to be arriving in inflatable dinghies provided to them by the United Nations, if not by the Soros Open Society. They wouldn’t even have made the trip across alive without our help.
This is surely strange. Is it really the first time in human history that a people has voluntarily invited its own replacements? No, it’s not the first time. It happened to Spain right before the Islamic conquest, when certain merchants began inviting Muslim conquerors into Spanish city gates, then still ruled by the Gothic Germanic peoples. When it became clear what was happening, in 722 AD, when the Battle of Covadonga started, and a man named Pelayo started the Christian reconquest of the peninsula by establishing the Kingdom of Asturias.
A point of note is that it took approximately 781 years to complete the Reconquista and drive the Muslims back out. That’s what happens when you allow a subversive strand of people to take in your enemies.
The modern world built by Europeans is fading. When the blacks stole South Africa from Afrikaner rule, they made it worse. When the British seized India, they made it better. When the Europeans arrived to Australia, they introduced civilization. When the Indians and Pakistani take over England, England will collapse.
If we allow cousin-marrying foreigners to overrun our lands, we will be thrown back to the level of subsistence farming, barely getting by, living among the ruins of our ancestral glory. Our cities are at risk of fading away like the pyramids of Latin America. Once, centers of power and wealth, soon, relics of times forgotten.
What Soros and others are doing to the West could take a thousand years to undo. But perhaps, for those who are impatient like me, there is another way: a trick.
Masks Off
Meanwhile, White people are turning their backs on the cities their forebears once built. In fact, both leftist and right-wing White people are leaving the diverse cities at similar rates. They are migrating away and settling in the still pleasant suburbs, moving closer to nature, or even going off the grid.
The modern migrant forcing his way into the White man’s house may feel entitled to what he didn’t build, and could never have built on his own. White people, however, shall have the last laugh, as we prepare to improve our lives in ways others cannot. We are the avant-garde, again, the forefront, the first to leave urban civilization behind, to turn our backs on the machinations and regimentations of an oversaturated economic system, to free ourselves, and once again, begin exploring the world.
We’ve learned our lessons. We’ll never share our civilization with strangers again. Take for example the words of one so-called “black professor” from Canada, Ben Philippe, who published a novel in 2021 called Charming as a Verb, in which he wrote:
"When this race war hits its crescendo, I'll gather [all you White people] into a beautifully decorated room under the pretense of unity. I'll give a speech to civility and all the good times we share; I'll smile as we raise glasses to your good, White health, while the detonator blinks under the table, knowing the exits are locked and the air vents filled with gas.”
They want you dead. They want all of you dead.
This novel was advertised as “exploring the complexities of being a black teenager”. I can only assume part of those complexities involves suffering from psychopathy. It wouldn’t surprise me at all that underneath their thick skins, all minorities think like this. Author Philippe revealed the friendly mask minorities wear around us. As soon as they win the power, though, their masks will slip. As with the Clovis people, and with the Vikings of Greenland, they will murder us all.
It would be wrong, however, to call these minorities racist, for that is a big person’s word that eludes their tribal minds. Black and brown people live as clans of family members, just as the primitive family clans of prehistory. This is why such large numbers of them, after all, marry their first cousins, from 30% of marriages in Turkey up to 70% of marriages in Pakistan. They do so in order to avoid having to live with strangers, to avoid having to share their wealth with outsiders.
While they may say that some European royalty used to marry their cousins, too, the difference is that European people condemned it and shunned the practice. Europeans already avoided cousin marriages before Catholicism came along. And before you say anything, compare that Pakistani 70% to just 0.2% of citizens of Alabama. Pakistani people are 350 times as likely to marry their first cousins.
How did anyone think such people could be made compatible with our society of equality? They have no such concept.
See, the reason non-Whites call us racist so often and so easily is because White people tend to extend love to perfect strangers of their own race, even to strangers of another race. It is this act of kindness that elicits a disturbing sense of murderous envy among non-Whites.
The tribal man could never conceive of helping others outside of his immediate family. The idea of digging water wells to help other people seems an almost incomprehensible act to them, as though it were murder. A black man living in the USA, for example, might feel genuinely racially discriminated against whenever White people donate money to help other black Africans living in Africa, because the African-American man will be left wondering why he didn’t get any money?
See, those racist White people passed him over! That’s why they hate us! Because we are too kind. But won’t ever have to be again. Those days are over.
The Trick
If I may paraphrase exploring the complexities of growing up White in a multicultural society, such as The Netherlands, I would, per Ben Philippe, “gather all the non-Whites in our beautifully decorated cities under the pretense of equality. I’d hand them over all of our wealth, and the keys to all of our homes. I’d even throw in some prostitutes to keep men busy while the subway trains loaded with thermonuclear bombs ride into town, quietly unseen, knowing my fellow White people have already left the cities, and the roads and bridges leading out have been sabotaged.”
I mean all this in a literary sense, of course, for I could never think of doing something like this. But then again, our dwindling White birth rates may prove a benefit. The people with the larger numbers will forever be condemned to living in the most dystopian cities, and those cities will always be at risk of blowing themselves and everyone in them up.
I’m just saying, I think we’re going to be fine. Whatever happens next, one thing is for sure. White people’s future lies outside city walls. Even in case of a nuclear apocalypse, we could just reconvene on the steppe lands of Eurasia, or on the planes of North America, where we belong, and live happily ever after.
Share this post