I introduced the livestream with a talk about how different environments modulate human behavior and culture. And then I turned to the main topic, which were the migrant riots in Torre Pacheco, Spain:
Locals from the Spanish town of Torre Pacheco, located in the country’s south-eastern region of Murcia, just south of Valencia and Alicante, decided not to lavish violent Moroccan migrants with praise, but rather to hunt them down and teach them a lesson after violent youths brutally attacked an elderly man. Yet, the Western mainstream media, all in unison, decided to cry foul and accuse native Spaniards of being organized right-wing extremists. But why?
The hunt for violent migrants triggers fear, not only in the migrant populations, but especially in the leftist extremists professing a sort of White man’s burden, in that they think that White people are supposed to be responsible babysitters while immigrant children burn down our societies.
In Torre Pacheco, a town with a population of just 35,000 people, over 30% of the inhabitants are now migrants, most of those from Morocco, and many of them illegal, despite Morocco being a relative safe-haven. It is not a war zone. Morocco is not being bombed by the West, either.
Moroccans have simply given birth to too many children without caring to offer them a future in their shitty economy. That’s no one else’s fault but their own, and it certainly isn’t the responsibility of Europeans to, now, absorb Morocco’s unwanted young males.
Let’s not even make that distinction between legal and illegal immigration. Every non-European migrant is one too many in Europe. The European Union seems to have adopted the dogma of George Soros and his Open Society Foundations that Europe must absorb 1 million migrants per year, minimum, and supposedly indefinitely, until White Europeans have either been erased or civil war settles the score.
Well, civil war was has arrived. Southern Spain, apart from its tourist destination, isn’t considered a rich region of the world, either. So when violent Moroccan thugs beat up a grandfatherly man, a 68-year-old, his bludgeoned eyes sparked a flame in the hearts of local Spaniards. Genetic memories of the Reconquista must have driven their actions, perhaps guided by the spirit of El Cid Campeador.
Who could blame them? But does a spontaneous response qualify to call these locals ‘right-wing extremists’, as even American media have done, just because their actions were announced in a shared Telegram or WhatsApp group? No, these locals likely have no political affiliations other than being fed up with the uncontrolled violence of an increasing number of unwanted guests. Why, after all, should any people sit by idly while foreign people, with the full protection of the law, can take over one’s town?
The White backlash over unwanted immigrants does threaten to pop the liberal feel-good bubble. It turns out there are limits to diversity, and Europeans aren’t naturally going to allow foreign hordes to extinguish them with higher birth rates and racially motivated sexual violence.
Western leftists are so embedded in their woolly vanity project called diversity and inclusion, that they refuse to accept that migrants can be perpetrators, too. They prefer explaining away any backlash against violent foreigners, rapists, murderers, thieves, and other cognitively impaired weirdos by claiming that the migrants are the real victims. How does that even work?
This, they say, is because violent, extremist migrants really are like small children who need to be raised and educated into Europe’s future doctors and engineers, though IQ tests already prove otherwise.
We can all suspect that Western feminism, which has put many liberal women into positions of power, plays a role. Instead of using their power to protect their own people, these White feminist women are guided by their frustrated mothering instincts and, instead, choose to provide cover for violent animals. It’s a form of Stockholm Syndrome, whereby the victim chooses her own perpetrator.
Our justice systems, all over the Western world, have drafted up excuse after excuse to exonerate insane levels of migrant violence. In Germany, one judge told a girl, who was gang-raped by 8 foreigners taking turns for over 3 hours, that her rapists were simply traumatized by the fact they migrated to Germany, and therefore, they should not be punished harshly. When another person took to the internet to complain about this verdict, that person was sentenced to a month longer in prison than the gang rapists due to alleged “hate speech”.
It is, indeed, considered hate speech for a German to say they love Germany.
See, the liberal consensus is that when white men rape, it’s because of their ingrained genetic ‘whiteness’, because white men, as everyone knows, are born inferior beings whose only remedy is to be sent to jail, castrated, killed, or purged in an oven. But when brown men commit much more heinous crimes at far greater frequencies, both in relative and, increasingly, in absolute numbers, liberal judges will staunchly acquit those foreign sickos on the grounds that they suffer from a range of cognitive impairments, including having a low IQ, having a trauma, or being actually inbred.
This is one of those hard to understand ‘features’ of the Western justice system. It says that people who cannot be held responsible for their violent actions must, therefore, be let loose among the public, so that they can strike again, and harm even more people. Instead of directing violent migrants to permanent supervision in mental hospitals, we unleash them upon the next unsuspecting victims, without warning.
There is a deliberateness to it. One suspects that Western judiciaries have received orders from above, not only to acquit murderous foreigners, but to criminalize natives who dare to resist. Is it, perhaps, all part of the mystical Kalergi Plan to set native European women and girls up for their industrial-scale mass rape? By protecting foreign combatants and their sexual terrorism, we are effectively orchestrating the mass rape of Europa.
Testament to the European character, our morale hasn’t been broken yet. When the locals of the town of Torre Pacheco took to the streets, they vowed to burn down the hallmarks of Islamic squatter colonialism, namely the proverbial kebab and mosque, the barracks of Islamic hate.
Leftist politicians blame the right-wing politicians of Spain’s Vox party for escalating the riots. Vox recently announced their plan to deport at least 8 million migrants from Spain, including migrants’ children born in Spain. It is an example all of Europe should follow. Europeans should counteract the twisted Soros Open Society plot by doubling the number of deportations to at least 2 million per year.
The idea that Europe should have to absorb the discarded, low-quality populations from the rest of the world needs to die an ignominious death. Not all ideas are equal, and diversity and multiculturalism stands out as particularly moronic.
The leader of Spain’s Vox party, Mr. Santiago Abascal, responded to leftist accusations by saying the migrant rapes and knife stabbings had been entirely the Left’s fault. We can only hope that Torre Pacheco becomes Europe’s ground zero in the war against unwanted immigrants. However, I feel that street violence can only be so effective. The real target for our backlash ought to be that weird liberal psychology that insists migrants are poor and needy people who need our help.
It’s time to confront the mentally feeble leftists in charge of our institutions with this reality that single, male migrants are, in practice, hostile foreign combatants. They are enemy soldiers. They didn’t come for help. They came to exploit and rape.
We, Europeans, still possess every means necessary to throw them out of our countries. We have every moral right to defend our homelands. There is no reason to submit ourselves to the fantasies of self-hating liberal elites. So let us take after the brave Spaniards, brace for impact, and revolt!
Share this post