Today’s background painting is called Belshazzar’s Feast (John Martin, 1821), depicting a scene after Babylon destroyed the First Temple in what is now Israel.
A commenter noted that their 3-year-old toddler appeared to behave as a drunk adult man. The comparison got me to study the cognitive side effects of the most popular recreational drugs in use throughout recent history, say, since the 1920s.
And indeed, each popular substance, varying from decade to decade, from alcohol to fentanyl and everything in between, if used regularly, has the specific effect of experiencing impaired memory, diminished cognition, and reduced executive function or decision-making ability. Recreational drugs are likely so popular because they help return people to a childlike state, presumably, to escape the dread of adult responsibilities.
A Dependent People
I’m not a fan of drug abuse, but now I understand better why so many conservative movements traditionally always argue against drug use and even against alcohol. Though I can relate to people seeking temporary relief from stress, for example, it becomes a problem when addictions trap people in a permanent childlike state when the cognitive damage becomes lasting or even permanent.
Even marijuana, for example, especially when regular use starts in one’s teenage years, leads to a permanent cognitive slowdown in adulthood. Is this, now, the so-called “opening of one’s mind” that liberals advertise? It appears, to me, more like a closing of one’s mind. There’s nothing revolutionary about not being able to make decisions.
I can also see why liberal movements traditionally have always argued for the use of legally permitted drugs. Profit motives may play a role, as well, since many states around the world, or at least their elites, by law tend to control the production of alcohol or other recreational substances, such as Sweden’s Systembolaget, a government-owned chain of liquor stores. Under the Romanov family, the Czar family, the Russian state controlled the production of vodka, offering a considerable stream of income.
The other reason may be that people, devolved into a reduced state of cognition, become more governable. A person regularly under the influence of recreational substances that diminish one’s memory function, executive function, and decision-making ability, can no longer be expected to govern himself.
See, a modern state needs a dependent people, and dependent people need a state to govern them. It’s a two-way process. There are people who prefer to shun adulthood and relinquish their responsibilities to a more powerful actor, such as Father Government or Mommy Media. The supply of such people is matched by the needs of a state for precisely the irresponsible people who need constant supervision.
It’s a business model. It’s much easier to control citizens if they would exist permanently on a lower level of mental capacity than to have to deal with outspoken adults who demand to be treated equally and seriously by the State! Taken to the extreme, the difference between independent humans and algorithmic slaves is that between lions roaming the plains and termites following the queen’s programming. Aldous Huxley warned of it in his novel Brave New World, but I suspect that our globalist overclass sees it as desirable to have people biologically conditioned by functional caste.
That functionality implies a people’s erasure. It means making people into a blank slate so that the state can reprogram them as needed. Biological features of language, race, culture, sex, or nation must all be effaced to make us as visually identical as termites or ants. This is what is meant by equality. It’s the erasure of your personality, your race, and of your national culture in order to make newborns interchangeable and ready for their conditioning. Whether raised as drone manager or worker drone, the future salary will be identically 0, for you will be a slave regardless of rank or fervor.
If so-called liberal and progressive regimes, then, can benefit from reducing their population’s cognitive functioning, by making people dependent on substances that also make people more dependent on the State for their governance, does that, perhaps, also explain why such states should favor demographics with lower IQs, more akin to the abilities of children? Does all of this have anything to do with the push for feminism, putting more childless women in charge of society who end up treating their electorates as though we were still children in need of a caring mother?
It’s an attack on responsible adulthood disguised as hedonistic pleasure.
Political Colors
All this brings me to color theory. Bear with me. They say that the color black represents dominance or power, and white signifies supremacy, whereas brown means maturity, red means leadership, green is wealth or nature, and blue is trustworthiness. This might be complete nonsense, though I can see why the brightest colors of the rainbow are now being used together in the new cultural emblem of the West, the Pride flag, because these bright colors mimic precisely the colors that children love so much.
The color scheme of one’s natural culture kind of represents their underlying values. The red-white-blue so often found on flags of North-Western Europe appears to indicate societies that value leadership, superiority, and trustworthiness more than anything. The rainbow flags, by contrast, represent a sort of insanity. Rainbows used to be considered as a symbol of God’s covenant with Noah, and in Norse mythology a rainbow, named Bifrost, was a bridge to Asgard, to Valhalla.
Others will be looking for a pot of gold. But we never made rainbows our national emblems.
Today, toy stores stand out in a shopping street precisely for these colors, to lure children in with their excitement, and then, to deceive the same children into identifying with an LGBT movement. One of my viewers noted a while ago that certain toy stores have started waving the Pride flag, and many kids’ toys carry the rainbow flag as its symbol. This is how poison is often delivered, disguised as something appetizing. In this case, it’s the mental poison of a child-hating cult wrapped in colorful gift wrapping.
In many countries around the world, we attach colors to our political parties. In most Western countries, there is a saying that one must admit to one’s political color. It means to disclose one’s preferred political system or movement, coded by a certain RGB value. Generally speaking, red stands for socialism or communism, green for ecology and environment, blue for conservatism or liberalism, and yellow, which is a mix of red and light green, for libertarian.
In my country of The Netherlands, the liberal-progressive business party VVD carries a deep blue, the socialist party SP has its tomato red, and the Dutch Reformed Party carries the royal orange. This is how it is in most countries that have a conservative, liberal, or socialist political wing.
In the USA, they seemingly reversed it, as the Republican Party carries the red, and the Democrats carry the blue, i.e., the difference between leadership and trustworthiness. The apparent swap (red right, blue left) comes from the fact that Republicans started out as the anti-slavery, pro populist party, and they are still the more populist party. A billionaire technocrat would ordinarily vote Democrat.
The greens everywhere are associated with natural wealth, and, for some reason, with the deserts of Islam. Green happens to be Islam’s house color, and I always took it to mean a threat, namely in reference to the lush green pastures just north of the Islamic world, namely in Europe, the place that Muslims have so often attempted to conquer during the past 1400 years.
Black and White
More interestingly, the colors white, brown, and black are nowadays often absent from the parliamentary spectrum. Rather, they have disappeared, and that is because the mature deep brown color is associated with the brownshirts of German National Socialism, and the dominant black color references the Italian Fascists, ignoring even the white of the Worldwide White Supremacy.
These more mature colors—black, brown, and white—are particularly exempt from the rainbow Pride flag. I get the refractory meaning of it. Using a prism, you can fracture White light into all the other colors. The white light dissolves into its components and this symbolizes diversity, for the words “more diversity” just mean “fewer White people”.
Black light, on the other hand, doesn’t exist, and I’m not referring to the deep UV-A purple sometimes called a blacklight. Black is actually the absence of color and can symbolize the absence of a State. To truly comprehend the meaning and power of color, I recommend getting a copy of Theory of Color, a book by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the famous German poet who was also a part-time research scientist.
Like Fascists and anarchists, Muslim jihadists have adopted the black flag. Each in their own way seeks to topple a regime they no longer support. Though in the case of Fascism, however, the goal is to overthrow globalist liberalism and restore national order. Jihadists would be looking to establish a tribal Islamic order alien to Western values. Anarchists just want to overthrow any and all order, but the color black still fits their need for winning personal dominance.
It makes sense that Benito Mussolini, before he became a Fascist, started out as an anarchist working for a socialist paper in Italian-speaking Switzerland.
In Ernst Jünger’s novel Eumeswil (Ömswil), the author proposes the anarch in contrast to the monarch. Both the monarch and the anarch are absolute rulers, but the anarch doesn’t have a people. Unlike the anarchist, the anarch doesn’t hate society, nor does he seek to destroy it. The anarch blends in with the world like a chameleon without worrying too much about the law.
Being like an anarch may be a useful step toward re-empowering oneself, to loosen the tie between one’s citizenship and state control. An anarch, in sense, is an adult who doesn’t take the outside world all too seriously.
Maturity and Supremacy
I hope after all this talk of colors in politics you can now also appreciate why the Third Reich swastika flag had such a powerful appeal, as did the flag of Japan, —and this isn’t a coincidence—, combining the red of leadership with the white of supremacy. Notice that without the Swastika, the German flag would have been the inverse of the Japanese flag, and that both countries were allies during World War II.
Indeed, after the end of World War II, the politics of diversity have almost entirely replaced the tougher politics of a dominant, mature supremacy. But isn’t that a bit odd? Why would the most mature, superior, and powerful colors be banned from the West’s political spectrum, the same black, brown, and white missing from the pride flag?
Well, as with the disappearance of the colors of the political far-right, maturity has also been replaced with a worship of childishness. Remember when adulting became a verb and kids were told never to grow up?
Nowadays, TV and Netflix propaganda bombard people with this message that we should reconnect with our inner child. What I actually think is happening is that ordinary citizens are being domesticated. They are specifically instructed, through media and education, not to develop the skill to govern oneself, but to remain totally dependent on State guidance.
Who wouldn’t agree, today, that education is meant to stunt your development and stifle your progress? It’s meant to dumb your down because it’s to prevent you from leveling up.
The Invisible
There is a hidden color, here. It is the unseen, transparent layer of modern power, the invisible color of corporate globalism, like a see-through mirror. To shatter it, we shall need a neo-Fascist or neo-Reactionary counter-movement, a form of anti-globalist anarchism, not merely to destroy globalism and then to live among its pointy shards, but to clean up the whole mess, and to revive a mature and healthy nationalism in its place.
We shall shatter globalism into a thousand nations by uniting the dominant, mature leaders among our peoples to take over. The power wielded by multinational corporations needs to be brought back under the command of national leaders, rather than to let commercial interests dictate the behaviors of our citizens. The commercial world has totally perverted traditional life. It has reduced people into Pavlovian dogs who secrete saliva at the push of a button.
There is no debate. We are not going to say please. The reproductive health of our peoples must not be corrupted by corporate psychologists who study how to make men more addicted to porn. The porn industry, —and the word ‘industry’ is as offensive as it gets here, implying its actors are cattle—, needs to be completely shut down.
The point is that the commercialization of human reproductive activity means humanity has already lost its reason to exist. As in Huxley’s novel Brave New World, or as in any ant or termite colony, sexuality and reproduction have been made wholly subservient to State interests, directed by a Queen, guarded by her lackeys.
Biologists call ants and termites “social insects”. Really? What’s social about having no mind of one’s own to think and to merely exist as a rule-following, neutered drone?
Herrenvolk
Human beings aren’t meant to be cogs in a giant profit-generating machine. I have a vision of establishing what the Germans once used to call a Herrenvolk, sometimes incorrectly translated as master race. Alternatively, one can translate Herr into the sense of the British “Lord”.
A Lord is a person of authority and influence, nobility who are free to do as they please, so a German Herrenvolk is more literally translatable as a “people of free men”. Note that Deutschland, the German name for Germany, literally translates as the “people’s land”—people as opposed to serfs and slaves.
An authoritative, influence people, then, is a Herrenvolk, i.e., a mature people largely capable of governing themselves under the umbrella of a small but dominant authority that guards a sensible morality and backs a religious order. We should pursue the politics of maturity and dominance, not of destitution and soul-murder. Let children be children, please but tell adults to be adults.
To succeed in our goal of transforming the present humiliation of being treated as children by the toddlers in power, we must recreate the traditional culture of initiation rites for teenagers, for both boys and girls.
How did societies of the past succeed in transforming their children into functional and responsible adults? They understood the power of initiation. Generally speaking, such rituals work as follows: In case of boys of around the ages of 12 to 18, at some point, they are removed from their mothers. They are taken to an unknown place where they are given a new set of clothes. Often they will wear the old clothes of soldiers or warriors of past generations.
Then, for one or more weeks, the boys are trained in the skills necessary to become mature male adults, no longer the property of their parents, but now introduced as equal members of their tribe.
In some cultures, boys were required to spend several days surviving on their own in the wild without any help. This complete isolation and abandonment instilled in them a need to begin thinking for themselves. It awakened in the sons of society their survival instincts. It taught men to rely on themselves, not to wait for orders.
Return of Men
If this is the experience you’re still looking for, I recommend taking a backpack to Northern Scandinavia and to hike along the King’s Trail by yourself for a few weeks. I remember returning home to the civilized world feeling deeply offended by the first pedestrian traffic light telling me to wait for green. For two weeks, nothing had made me stop walking wherever I pleased, until a machine monitored by a police force told me to.
This is how we wake ourselves up. Or as the lady from Lapland told me, “What a strange place this London must be. They have all these politicians there telling people what to do!” She was an Anarch. In her valley, there was no police force, and no politician had ever visited her town.
To this attitude we must all return, to tradition and family. To achieve it, we shall first make boys men again. Make them men who can withstand the world on their own, when necessary. This man, a Herr to his Volk, is psychologically mature, no longer childish. This man’s camouflage includes shades of black, brown, white, and red: the colors of dominance, maturity, supremacy, and leadership.
Never forget: None of us were put here on this earth to be obedient taxpayers. We are descendants of free men that came before us. We aren’t ants or termites. If we have to be anything at all, we should be lions.
The so-called modern age appears to us as time lost. It’s time to make up for it. It’s time to act. It’s time for a Reaction.
Share this post