Idolatry is the worship of an image in place of God, and most Abrahamic cults forbid it. But the accusation of idolatry is all too often lodged against people for worshiping their ancestors who looked like them, and for fashioning themselves in their gods' image. Our ancestors didn't worship physical objects. They worshiped the racial soul of their people.
Talking Points
Men and women who drowned in Northern Europe’s bogs thousands of years ago have had their facial features preserved so well that all who see them are astonished at how similar they look to modern white North-Europeans.
It proves something. It means our ancestors have managed to maintain a certain phenotype, or a collection of phenotypes, through the ages.
But today, diversity demands us to abandon these successful lineages and mix Europeans with Africans, Arabs, and Asians, and everyone else.
If diversity defeats us, if we fail to pass on our phenotypes, our distant offspring may someday find our mummified remains, but they will consider us an alien race, and they will not be able to make the connection that we were once their ancestors.
Diversity, then, means to uproot us from our ancestral past, to disconnect us, forever, and to dissolve us into a globalist, racially homogenized collective.
BRIDGE TO NEXT POINT And when we pour our phenotype into artworks representing our gods—Thor, Odin, Freya—we are accused of being idol worshipers. Soon, indeed, the artworks in Europe’s national museums will no longer represent the people inhabiting European cities—the once so fertile white men and women will all but cease to exist.
Three thousand years ago, the ancient Greek artists began developing an innovation—realistic though idealized representations of human bodies. An expression of the true Greek soul, their greatness, and of their worldview: Greeks saw the world as a body, a living organism. It’s why the poet Homer thought the oceans had the color of blood, red rather than blue.
Less artistic peoples of the Levant, of course, had no choice but to respond to ancient Greek sculpture with jealousy. The Greek creations were not only superior artworks, they were also distinctly GREEK artworks. Works of Greek bodies showing off the strength of their men and the beauty of their women.
Worse—many of the Greek’s statues represented their Gods—gods fashioned in the image of Greeks themselves, their phenotype. Such idealized representations of bodies always shall forever remind onlookers of the race that created the artworks—and of the jealousy of the peoples that could not create them.
So, Islamic conquerors of the province of Bamiyan in Afghanistan, flushed with feelings of inferiority, had no choice but to destroy the Famous Buddha statues, who, according to source, used to have European faces with blond hair and red beards
The accusation of idolatry, a typical Semitic construct found in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, specifically prohibits any follower of these cults from making representations of God.
The reason, of course, is a simple as it is devlish: In order to create a global religion, or any global ideology, you need to make it racially inclusive. If it is your intention is to absorb people from all races and ethnicities, you do not want God to look this or that way, for it might impede foreign-looking people’s acceptance of your religion.
But the accusation of idolatry itself is also false. The Greek, despite their culture of artworks, weren’t actually worshiping idols. They weren’t worshiping the statues, the phenotypes per se. They were merely worshiping their ancestral spirits, in an idealized, materialized form.
The audacity to think one’s gods might actually look like oneself, of course, is further evidence of a strength of character, unafraid to make such a bold statement, that our gods look like us.
Keep in mind that most ancient peoples lived out their entire lives, without ever making contact with foreign-looking peoples, the interactions were minimized to the periphery of their habitats, cut off, normally, by broad rivers, swamps or mountain ridges;
Meaning that most people through the ages never met people who didn’t look like them, and so , there was no reason for them to worship their own image per se, and no reason to doubt that heir goods also looked like them;
Only through the expansion of empires, i.e. the Roman invasion of Northern Europe for example, that different-looking peoples became acquainted with one another.
Indeed, globalist expansion has as its prerequisite that is must accuse all foreign peoples of being guilty of idolatry, and must seek to destroy their idols as a way of severing the ties with a racially different past.
And only now, suddenly, did the problem of idolatry arise, for images of Odin and Thor looked like the Nordic peoples, and not like Romans or Africans. Marvel Comics solved that problem by simply opening the doors of Valhalla to Africans—Idris Elba playing Heimdall, called the whitest of all gods in the Norse mythology.
The accusation of idolatry misses the point: it is not the likeness of our forebears we worship, but rather their spirits, since and artwork is an expression of the soul of the artist, and therefore, of the soul of his people, the well from which the race sprung; the physical representation of our bodies is also an expression of that very soul, that ancestral collective soul
Our ancestors were not idol worshipers. They did not believe their gods were made of flesh and blood. They rather believed only in the collective racial soul of their people, but the mere fact that this people once had, and still has, a distinct and recognizable look does not make them evil primitives. It makes them healthy and fertile.
We have the right to say no to diversity and to preserve our kind. We have the right to continue to preserve our phenotypes. We have the right to represent our gods as men and women who look like us—as ideals we wish to attain, and so, through our changing ideals we shall carve a path out of the world, to guide us to a future befitting of our races.
After all, the Germanic peoples never believed in the material world. The English word for world, for example, comes from vir-old,
World – Wir-old, men through the ages: we worship and preserve the souls of our ancestors flowing through the ages, and as our ancestors looked like us five thousand years ago, our offspring shall still look like them five thousand years from now—because our bodies shall be the expression of that superior soul, the collective racial soul of our people—
And evidence of our superior ability to resist our assimilation into global rabble. We will prove our superiority precisely by successfully rejecting diversity and globalism. We shall cling to our idols, so to speak, to steer a clear course toward a healthy, fertile future for our people, so that, five thousand years from now, our descendants may find some of our remains and instantly, without any doubt, recognize us as their ancestors.
