The legitimacy of the West as a global civilization rests on the pillars of the Renaissance and the Bible. Children of the West, for example, are told of the ancient Hebrews and their exodus from Israel, of the Egyptians, the Persians, and the Babylonians, and of classical antiquity, of Ancient Greece and Rome, and of how Italians and Germans picked up where they left off to establish modern Western civilization, as though the West were the one legitimate recipient of all past civilizational knowledge.
It does sound a bit suspicious, doesn’t it? Modern history tells a story of continuous progress from Adam to Joe Biden, and of Western civilization as the sole heir of all future history. That is, until Western explorers came into contact with the equally ancient civilizations of Latin America, of India, and of China.
But what if I questioned this progressive narrative? What if I told you a completely different story? What if the Jews and their history, as recorded in the Old Testament Bible, were invented during the 16th and 17th century when people who identified themselves as Jews migrated to North-Western Europe. Or that the Latin New Testament Bible was a heathen or native European response to the success of the Jewish literary innovation that was the Pentateuch. With the invention of cheaply made paper—in Europe, not in China—and the printing press, all of a sudden, every self-respecting power clique needed to have its own Holy Book. According to this thesis, Judaism, Christianity, and even Islam were recent inventions. Christianity was rather a response to the fairly recent Jewish presence in Europe, and formerly heathen temples, Europe’s Gothic Valhallas (halls for the slain), were transformed into Christian cathedrals during the 16th through 19th centuries.
According to this theory, the European Renaissance didn’t rediscover long-lost works of ancient writers such as Plato, Tacitus or Julius Caesar, but rather invented them and popularized them with the help of the printing press. Classical antiquity, then, was rather a product of the Renaissance period, when German and Italian scholars feverishly began inventing Europe’s history. Real history, as recorded on paper, doesn’t start until around the 18th century AD. Any claim made about events before the 12th century have been completely made up. That is because paper didn’t exist yet, and the extremely expensive parchment and papyrus completely rot away in several centuries’ time. Moreover, alleged ancient writers such as Plinius simply wouldn’t have been able to afford to buy the papyrus needed to become a well-versed writers.
As bizarre as it sounds, this is precisely the claim of a number of impressing scholars, including, last but not least, Sir Isaac Newton and Friedrich Nietzsche. Others such as Nikolai Morozov, Wilhelm Kammeier, Anatoly Fomenko, Uwe Topper, and Heribert Illig all point to the complete falsification of ancient history that began in Europe during the second half of the second millennium.
If, in the past, a priestly class wrote history the same way we nowadays write the science fiction of the future, today, we face the greatest threat to our survival. For if history can be written, it can be rewritten, and if history can be rewritten, it can be rewritten again. History is written by the victors. If Europe is won by an alliance of Russians, Turks, and Chinamen, they will tell us ancient Egyptians were Chinese, Europeans were Turkic, and the Russian Horde built Stonehenge. If we let an American-led NATO subdue the East, we will be fed stories of a utopian future, of transhumanism, of human beings as programmable machines all working in harmony to establish the dreamed God-Mind.
Goerge Orwell said it right, Who control the past controls the future, and who controls the present controls the past. It is, therefore, in our best interest to do away with notions of a “real history” and rather focus our attention toward a “defensible history” that withstands the test of time. We must, in other words, learn from Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race, of Alfred Rosenberg’s Myth of the Twentieth Century, and perhaps even of Arthur Kemp’s March of the Titans. It’s time for our peoples to start writing history, again, and take back the future.
Books and Sources
Joseph Scaliger 1540-1609
Thesaurus TemporumIsaac Newton 1642-1726
The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms AmendedRobert Baldauf (Friedrich Nietzsche) 1844-1900
History and CriticismNikolai Morozov 1854-1946
The Revelation in Storm and ThunderWilhelm Kammeier 1889-1959
The Falsification of German History / of Early Christianity, etc.Anatoly Fomenko 1945-present (The Russian Horde)
History: Science or Fiction? Vols 1-7Uwe Topper 1940-present (Große Aktion, Sprachbaum?)
The Great Action, Europe’s Invented HistoryHeribert Illig 1947-present (Phantomzeit, No Charlemagne)
The Invented Middle AgesAlternative Alternatives
Alfred Rosenberg
The Myth of the Twentieth CenturyArthur Kemp
March of the TitansMadison Grant
The Passing of the Great Race