In this live-streamed talk, I introduced my concept of “confrontationalism”, a new kind of political strategy, and then went on to interact with the audience.
Below you also find my “primer” on confrontationalism:
—
I’m not a fan of big words, but White men need to adopt confrontationalism as a political path forward. We need to organize our able-bodied fighting men into factions willing to confront our archenemy, the Institutional Leftist. Those with a conflict-loving nature shall be recruited to form the Phalanx, a group ready to break through enemies lines.
People who seek confrontation with the status quo are the only ones who’ll ever change anything. They address the difficult topics no one else is talking about openly. They are willing to act. But they are also at greatest risk of being jailed or getting killed for their actions. Only those with the least fear of death shall populate our frontline in the war against Global Leftism.
It is of little use trying to “wake up the normies” who, by definition, remain dull and inanimate. Rather, we shall follow the metaphor of “joining the other lions”.
It was said by Hagen in Siegfried’s Saga from the Edda that “if we would have more children, there wouldn’t be a mightier race on Earth: we would even withstand the gods.”
Confrontational-ism
When we speak of confrontation, we mean to confront a provably corrupt, flawed, or bad organizing system, usually the ones represented by governments and corporations. To confront them means to bring about this evidence of malpractice, and to force the actor (a state, an elite, etc.) to change their ways, “or else”.
The “or else” part implies the destruction of said actor for its unwillingness to better itself, so that it may be replaced with a superior, saner, and more truthful system. We act, therefore, not out of a pathological need to seek conflict, such as a thrill seeker would, but out of a desire to rectify persistent societal evils that, for too long, have gone uncontested.
We do all this because we no longer believe in the so-called democratic process that has historically failed us. What good is a democracy, for example, that allows corporations to create harmful medication, which are then, via a fraudulent democratic process, imposed onto a largely unwitting people?
When the democracy itself—as has often been proven—is prone to deception by outsiders, then what is the value of such a democracy if not to serve as an attack vector to harm our peoples? Confrontationalism solves this problem by attacking the wrong-doers head-on, rather than waiting for some miracle election to sway bureaucrats the right way.
If democracy doesn’t work, we need to confront it.
Share this post