Western ruling classes appear more interested in going after people for wrongthink and so-called hate speech than in improving their people’s material fate. Have our ruling elites perhaps started buying into their own propaganda, trapping themselves inside the echo chambers of their creation?
The power elite have unmoored from reality. Barely holding on to lofty feel-good ideals of equality, safety, or diversity, they compensate for their diminishing relevance. It’s so much easier to tell a good story than to fix a real problem. It’s easier to ignore reality than to have to face it. But they’ll throw you in jail for talking back at them, or even for offering solutions.
The Repression of Speech
That’s what happend to the leader of the Students against Tyranny association in Norwich, UK. That young man was arrested by six police officers for calling illegal migrants possibly involved in the rape of a local teenager “foreign filth”. But if we can’t call foreign filth “foreign filth” anymore, what sort of civilization do we expect to get?
Getting arrested for the wrong words has been a hallmark of Western nations’ style for certainly the larger part of the past half century. Cracking down on speech began around the same time that these Western governments felt the need to import guest workers from North Africa, and elsewhere, by the millions. And so, our own people’s fate became tied to the well-being of others, many of whom despise us, if not outright hate us.
But the regime of Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer uniquely stands out. Under his two-tier policing schemes, it has been part and parcel for ordinary citizens to be sentenced to lengthy jail time, just for the crime of posting a single X tweet or Facebook post. Notably, in the wake of the Southport killings, when three girls were brutally and repeatedly stabbed by a son of African foreigners, hundreds if not thousands of Brits were fast-tracked to jail.
Meanwhile, cases involving actual violence and rape, besides hurty words, are drawn out to last for over a year, such as the case of two brothers, one named Muhammad, the other Mohammed, who punched a policewoman in the face, breaking her nose. Media initially only reported on the White policeman who had to use force to restrain the attacker afterward, as though media were trying to create the British George Floyd story, before bodycam footage finally put an end to that evil, farcical twist.
These British kangaroo courts befit the dealings of dictators, not democratic leaders, who, after all, were put in office by the very people now being arrested, namely for complaining about the reality of life in the United Kingdom.
Last year, a woman named Lucy Connolly got about 3 years in prison for posting,
“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it.”
X didn’t think the tweet was inappropriate and didn’t take it down. The British police, however, considered the message a race hate crime, despite that Lucy deleted her message within 3 hours. Connolly was kept in pre-trial detention as a way of forcing her to confess to the crime, under the false impression that a confession would get her out of prison more quickly. This is yet another token treatment of dictatorial regimes. And again, the aforementioned “Muhammed brothers” suffered no such pressure to confess. Some media are still defending them, though Connolly was universally condemned.
This is what the word racism is for, but Connolly didn’t actually hate people because of their race. She hated these specific migrants, who had been in the news after the Southport riots, for potentially harboring rapists, gang rapists, thieves, and murderers among their population. The remark wasn’t meant to incriminate all innocent migrants, It was a remark targeted toward those immigrants who do show criminal tendencies. One has every right to be angered by imported crime, for there is crime, and some of it is imported. Her judge failed to appreciate this important nuance.
During the Southport riots, the very real and negative side effects of mass immigration had brought many British people, including Connolly to the brink of frustration. Something needed to be done, but everyone knew politicians and their police henchmen weren’t going to do it. So the people rose up, started speaking their minds, and starting making demands. Prime Minister Starmer responded by releasing actual criminals from prison to make more room for polite citizens with differing opinions.
Mind you, some of these policemen involved in arresting innocent civilians could be the sort of police officers who would gladly join in the gang rapes of White girls as young as ages 11 and 12. Indeed, some of them did join in. It highlights, once more, the very real two-tier policing, if not between natives and immigrants, then certainly between speech crimes and actual violent crimes. It’s the speech crimes that are treated with the full force of the law, whereas the violent crimes are often dismissed and covered up.
Partly, this may be explained by the fact that speech crimes, especially if they were expressed in writing only, can be tracked and documented, whereas a girl gangraped might have no witnesses or recordings of her assault. Still, that doesn’t explain why speech crimes put people away for many years, when proven gang rapists appear to be getting off the hook with a slap on the wrist.
So, I’m not a lawyer, but there’s a clear and major judicial overreach when it comes to hurty words. I’m only using Britain as an example, here, because the Starmerite regime is so extremist, but the same illogic is captivating Germany, France, and many other countries and their citizens.
I myself was met with two police officers around early 2022, after I had posted a messaged on X. I had responded to the news about the first Ukrainians arriving to The Netherlands as refugees. There had been a local protest against their arrival, especially since it was revealed that many of these first migrants to arrive were actually Africans from Ukraine. These Africans apparently saw the war with Russia as an excuse to apply for asylum—and a passport—in the European Union. As opposed to returning home to their native Africa, they “fled” to Europe.
I had written on X something along the lines of, “This feels like we’re at war. It’s time to prepare!” X, in my case, also didn’t think my expression was illegal or criminal. The police officers at my door let me off with a warning, and didn’t fine me or arrest me. I felt they had come to intimidate me into deleting the tweet. This, I thought, was very strange. Why wouldn’t they just report the tweet to X instead of bothering me? I had an almost 20-minute-long debate with these officers, concluding with me repeating that the mass migrations into our country made me feel like we were at war.
In Germany, it’s even worse. Your house will be raided and you’ll be arrested for calling a politician fat or stupid, especially when the person you’re referring to is actually fat or stupid.
A German podcaster / activist by the name of Schlomo Finkelstein, real name Aron Pielka, is now publicly known as a right-wing extremist, anti-feminist, racist Islamophobe. In reality, his podcast show was largely an almost intellectual criticism of the German regime. This man was no extremist, but was made out to be one by the authorities.
Mr. Pielka started his podcast in 2015 in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, France. The so-called racist offense that got Finkelstein alias Pielka arrested was posting an image of a White woman flanked by two Muslim men with the admonishment, “You must integrate, White woman!” I.e., the poster was an almost truthful yet critical statement that, in Germany, White people are being forced to integrate into their new Islamic colony.
Why would you arrest a podcaster for this “non-crime hate incident”, as they would euphemistically call it in England, if it is simply a valid description of modern life in Germany? The mere suggestion that a threat might emanate from migration populations is why. This sort of suggestion goes against he mandated government narrative of Western elites that “diversity is our strength”. After all, if diversity weren’t really a strength, our blind-sided elites would have to go to jail for ruining their nations.
Ignorant, Unmoored Elites
Some things are clear: We are dealing with Western elites who have no proper understanding of the physical reality under their governance, nor do they possess the competencies to improve our material conditions. Admitting to this, would diminish their relevance and their status. So, they respond with repression, to shut people up.
Our elites have lost touch with reality, but since they still control the media narratives, and since they can still direct the police forces, they can have you arrested for the wrong speech.
It might be helpful to describe to you what, for example, German politics is like. Recently, a female German Minister of the Bundestag parliament expressed worries that certain German schools were now visited by entirely non-German and non-White demographics. Some schools are entirely populated by the children of immigrants who, in many cases, don’t speak a word of German.
To resolve this unwanted situation, the German Minister then suggested to divide these migrant children across more schools, so that each school would have, at most, 30% of migrant children. What this Minister wasn’t aware of is that, in Germany, in that age group under 12-year-olds, over 45% of children are children of immigrants. That means you can’t divide them all around other schools to reduce their number to 30% per classroom, unless you’re thinking of deportations or gas chambers, which the Minister clearly wasn’t.
This German Minister was simply ignorant of the reality of modern German demographics. She didn’t know that Germany had already imported so many migrants, that German children are now almost an absolute minority in their own schools.
This explains why Western ruling classes concern themselves so much more with broadcasting pleasant-sounding narratives than with practical problems—because it’s easier to ignore or suppress demands for solutions. It’s easier to write a story about how you tackled a problem than to think a problem through.
At the same time, Western political circles also care much less about, say, the genocide of soldiers in Eastern Ukraine, or the crisis in Gaza. As long as these atrocities aren’t happening in one’s own country, they won’t affect one’s national elections so much.
In my view, our elites are no longer an aristocracy, per the original meaning of the word that they are a selection of the nation’s most competent, i.e., the “best”. Rather, they have become a kakistocracy, a selection of the nation’s worst, people with zero ability to deal with the material problems at hand.
And so, these kakistocrats, or weak elites, have fled into controlling narratives. Through their control of the media, the kakistocracy can still paint themselves as do-gooders who deserve to stay in power. Instead of providing an actionable vision for the future, they offer the tropes of equality, diversity, and inclusion. It’s a way of saying, “Well, we’re being invaded by hostile hordes of foreigners, but since stopping them would cost us a lot of money, we’ll pretend it’s really the native citizens who are the problem.”
And then, these weak elites, started falling for their own propaganda! It used to be so that cunning aristocrats worked hard to devise narratives they could sell to people, to sway them this way or another way. In The Netherlands, we had a politician named Frits Bolkestein who explained it as follows: “We try to engineer the support base for our policies.”
At least, back then, they still cared about winning the people’s support for political policy, even if it had to be done through manipulation. Today, our political classes simply dictate to us their policies, if they even bother speaking to us at all, lest we find out afterward what they have already decided for us.
All this reminds me of the famous cave analogy in Greek philosopher Plato’s book The Republic. This analogy uses the image of prisoners chained in a cave with their backs to a wall, only able to see shadows on the wall in front of them. The prison jailors would move images and shapes before a fire, behind the prisoners’ backs, in order to project shadows onto the wall before them. The prisoners, who had been born in this cave, believed that the shapes on the wall were the only real reality, since they had never been outside.
Our ruling classes, however, behave as jailors who have hypnotized themselves into believing in the figments of their own imagination, whereas the cave’s prisoners have now escaped to see the real world.
This is how I would describe modern social media. Our political jailors still believe in the narratives they’re trying to sell us—diversity, inclusion, safety, equality, etc.—thought ordinary people have long woken up. When we, the people, then attack the images our political masters command us to believe in, they respond with repression.
I’m thinking of one case in Sweden when the sixteen-year-old son of a liberal politician, Migration Minister Johan Forssell, turned out to be a member of a far-right anti-immigration group. The Minister felt the need to publicly call out and humiliate his son, even repenting for the crime of being his son’s father.
That son, of course, is right to be concerned with mass immigration. What a betrayal to know that one’s own father is the one responsible for flooding your future with Somalis and Nigerians, just to uphold the impoverishing ideals of multiculturalism.
Western governments obsess over "misinformation" or "hate speech" as a way of distracting us from their inability to provide their peoples a meaningful future. This is why I think the media responded with such shock over the Whites-only settlements in Arkansas and Missouri. What concerns the political elites is that people have the nerve to walk out of a society that no longer serves them. Think of it this way, there is no greater insult to a politician than to tell them you’re better off without them.
Breaking Out
According to Paul Colinvaux, the author of the book The Fates of Nations: An Biological View of History, Western states will continue becoming more repressive. He reasoned that rich states with smaller populations will be the first to openly wage war on poorer states with larger populations, and if that prediction comes true, we shall see the Western ruling classes commanding us to die in wars against Iran, Russia, China, and other such countries.
You see, there is a geopolitical component to the naivety of the Western kakistocacy. Since they know they can’t win a war with the East or with the Global South on their own, they need alliances with foreign parties such as India, Pakistan, or even Nigeria and Ethiopia. By making Western Europe half African or half Indian, we might win the loyalty of their peoples, and discard them in the war against China as soldiers of the west.
It’s also for this reason that Western governments say they love Islam so much. They have to say so in order to win the gas and oil supplies coming out of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, whose oil sheiks can easily switch to another clientele. If the West won’t absorb mass Islamic immigration, pass Islamophobia laws, or paint Islam as a favorable religion in Britain or Germany, well then they’ll just sell their oil to China and destroy the West anyway but via another route.
To me, it seems ignorant to allow foreign parties to have such a large influence over our domestic policy. I’ve long wondered at what point it becomes a favorable strategy to simply deal with the hardship of going without cheap foreign fuel. I think we have already crossed that point. So why then haven’t the Western political regimes collapsed yet? Why are they still holding on to their fantasies of inclusion?
To answer this question: Western financial elites can still generate more power and wealth doing it this way, and so the political henchmen who work for the billionaires, including foreign billionaires, will want to maintain the status quo, for now, while bankrupting the White middle classes.
I foresee a totally different future, namely one in which those very middle-class White people choose to break free from the constraints of globalism. People are beginning to realize how much better off they’ll be without the demands of foreign alliances that might turn hostile any moment.
We would need to return to a configuration as before the Industrial Age, when the machines started weakening our bodies and minds. But we wouldn’t need to return to destitution or poverty at all. Just like the Amish or the Mennonites, such Christian fundamentalist groups who, in fact, responded to the Industrial Age by removing themselves from it, we could learn from these communities how to pretty much do everything we need to do for ourselves.
A traditional life is a life that instills the values of competence and ability. It teaches children as young as ages four to bake bread again. It teaches teenagers how to build their own house. These skills are no different from the ones our ancestors used to possess when they had nine children to attend to. Indeed, we can cut loose from the machinations of modern economic life and return to a slower-paced but much more fulfilling life of practical action.
For this, I have envisioned a movement called The Reaction, a reactionary movement further to the right of Fascism and National Socialism, with the intent of beating back the past 500 years of progress since the invention of liberalism.
It isn’t enough to merely change the politics of the political body if the body itself has grown weak, sick, and old. We reserve the right to devour the old system and use it merely as nourishment for the next phase. The goal of the Reaction is to achieve what is called The Ascent. The thought process behind all this goes as follows:
We have lived through an age of decline and degeneracy that has wasted our people’s potential;
There is no more way forward toward the dreamed Utopia of socialism, nor can we easily go back to tradition, for liberalism has burned the connection between the present and the past;
But we can still go up, toward the Summit, where our destiny lies, where new future awaits us, as in a higher order of life, where we once again bridge our glorious past with a desired future;
To begin this Ascent, we form a movement called The Reaction;
The goal of the Reaction is to win spiritual renewal;
Renewal means to become charged with confidence and competence, the very foundations of true human freedom;
We shall become high in virility as Practical Men of Action, for our society will be based on what we learn to do for ourselves, no longer as slaves of redistributive systems that keep us in want;
We shall thus overcome the Decline of the West and usher in its Revival;
The Revival of the West brings us an entirely new, never-before-seen civilization, one that supports ourselves best;
We re-establish ourselves as the formidable rulers of our phenomenal domain.
This time, we won’t lose the war. This time, we will win.
Share this post