Ordinary People Are Insane
Or Why People Won't Resist Mass Immigration and Diversity Until It's Too Late
If you’d ask ordinary persons if they think unintelligent people can be heart surgeons, a surprising majority will answer in the affirmative. They’ll say intelligence has got nothing to do with being a skilled surgeon. Hard work and access to training do. But if you’d ask the same people a year later if they’d want the least intelligent surgeon in the world to perform their heart surgery, they’d exclusively answer “no”. So let’s explore this apparent mob insanity.
We can figure out why people often hold such wildly contradictory opinions. In the first case, the outcome didn’t affect them personally. Who cares if there are some unintelligent people allowed to be surgeons? As long as they work hard and do the training. That doesn’t affect me. But in the second case, all of a sudden, the heart surgeon affecting my health better be the best one I can get, because now it’s personal. I might die!
If this is how ordinary people usually reason, if not always, then how can democracy be the “best possible system”? In a democracy, people are guaranteed to vote for wildly different policies based solely on whether said policy will affect themselves or others. If migrants are dumped in lower-class neighborhoods, then why should middle-class voters care about immigration-fueled rape and crime? It doesn’t affect them, unless it means they get cheap laborers such as nannies, roofers, and gardeners.
Likewise, we hardly saw any anti-immigration riots in the country of the Netherlands until asylum centers were being opened right in the middle of middle-class neighborhoods, next to middle-class high schools and hockey clubs, such as recently in Loosdrecht. Then, the reasonably well-organized middle class instantly pushed back against the thought of having their daughters raped by blacks, North Africans, and Middle Easterners.
Previously, though, no middle-class Dutch citizen gave a hoot about the actual rape of the lower class’s children. In an act of sheer irony, the middle class people now affected by the consequences of their own vote (since the well-to-do tend to vote left-of-center), started complaining about the lack of lower-class solidarity! Why doesn’t the nation rise up together against this migrant invasion? Well, other towns and regions still aren’t affected.
And so, the backlash becomes predictable and manageable from the government’s perspective. People only riot when the value of their own home is affected, not when others’ homes are being invaded by criminal immigrants. By strategically targeting one after the other region for diversification (or rather, anti-gentrification), the total daily backlash remains small enough for police forces to crack down on. It’s the frog in a slow-boiling pot of water who doesn’t jump out.
This dynamic explains why almost all European national soccer teams are very diverse—because soccer is considered a lower-class sport meant for mass entertainment. Some national teams are nearly majority black, such as France’s men’s soccer. But the Dutch women’s field hockey team, for example, is still 100% White. And so is France’s U19 korfball team, as are most European ice hockey teams, curling teams, or weird semi-elite sports such as pole-vaulting.
Have you noticed a trend, here, though? Black athletes dominate sports that require explosive sprinting (track and field, soccer, etc.) but they are nearly absent in every other sport that requires good technique or intelligent teamplay. Never mind, that’s just an observation.
One might blame class instead, but isn’t class also based on group competence? Most middle-class European sports are nearly all-white because they source players from middle to upper-middle-class milieus, whereas soccer draws from the “favelas” of the poor and the destitute (and incompetent).
The insanity of the mob (I don’t care about what doesn’t affect me) applies to our cultural elites as well. A famous example is director Christopher Nolan who couldn’t praise Ellen Page enough for her role in The Odyssey. He called her a “he” as though the 5-foot girly munchkin were the very best choice to play an ancient Greek warrior.
It doesn’t affect Nolan and the other members of cultural and financial elites if ordinary people have to watch trans imbeciles or ugly black Helens of Troy. The cultural elites live in gated communities, and they are insulated from the antihuman trainwreck they have created.
Then what can we do about all this? If it is humanity’s general trend not to care about what does not affect them, and if it is precisely this insanity that democracy amplifies, then the solution is to do away with democracy and replace it with the leadership of a Divine Autocrat. Yes, I am saying that the American invention of involving a free people in the decision-making of the government was a mistake.
Democracy was a mistake precisely because it did not account for the consequences of mob insanity, namely that it would undermine the race and the people once thought fit enough to be ruled by democracy. The people most in favor of democracy are the ones most radically opposed to defending democracy’s boundaries. They favor globalism and open borders because it doesn’t immediately affect them. It does, however, affect democracy in the long run, and we have reached the end of this process already.
Democracy is dead because democratic people murdered it with immigration. It’s time to choose another way, one that transcends people’s carelessness and self-centeredness, by appointing a divine autocrat to rule over the West, a man who will restore order, defend our borders and bring back justice.