
FYI - this article is a sort of response to the brazen anti-White racism from Christian Ortiz’s poorly-written, low-quality, low-IQ article. Mine is to be taken with a grain of salt.
White wealth didn’t come from theft, violence, or selfishness. It came from being giving. By giving more, White people attracted trade partners from all over the world. During the Colonial Age, non-whites even preferred trading with Europeans because White people gave them better deals than their own people would. That way, White people attracted all the world’s wealth around them.
What Redditors long suspected—namely that South-Asian Indians are selfish—has now been proven by science: Indians are selfish. It also explains why places such as India, Pakistan or Bangladesh don’t have proper traffic rules. “Giving way” is not a concept favored among selfish people. Who cares about traffic victims? As one Indian saying goes, “The tears of strangers are just water.”
Selfish people also tend to marry their cousins (as Indians and Arabs do), because they don’t want to share inheritances with outsiders. This sets such cousin-marrying populations up for genetic decline and horrifying birth defects. The more giving White Europeans, according to a recent research, avoided cousin marriage even before Christianity, thus preserving their genetic health.
White genetic health shows up at the Summer and Winter Olympics where White people, despite being the tiniest 7% global minority, consistently win the majority of gold medals. The cousin-afflicted Indians and Arabs, on the other hand, hardly win any. Despite having more than a billion inhabitants, India won fewer gold medals than an average Eastern European country at the last Summer Olympics.
Tit for Tat
Being selfish is clearly a losing strategy. India has proven it. As per the science of game theory, a winning strategy involves giving back to those who give, and to retaliate against those who retaliate. One can, therefore, be neither too giving nor too naive. And that’s an area in which White people need to learn a few more lessons.
White selflessness turns into sheer naïveté in multicultural settings. Once we are forced to live with selfish or thievish foreigners who constantly try scamming and robbing us, the White strategy fails. If we don’t want to stoop to our enemies level and adopt their stubborn ways, it is imperative that White people learn to play tit-for-tat, instead.
How, exactly, do we return bad actors their favor? Playing tit-for-tat presupposes that we first correctly assess foreigners’ behaviors toward us. I therefore experimented whether it were possible to summarize some of the world’s largest ethnic groups (“races”?) in just one or two words. The purpose of this experiment is to reveal people’s core motivating principles.
I attempted the following summation:
Indians - selfish
White people - giving (naive)
Sub-Saharan black people - thievish
East Asians (excl. Japanese/Korean) - deceptive
Japanese/Korean - obedient
Arabs (Middle East / North Africa) - sick, warlike
Jews - manipulative
Aboriginal Australians - hunter-gatherers
Native Latin Americans - bloodthirsty
Turkic/Central Asian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi - rapist
Example: Black People
Using the above list, we can devise strategies to cope with our enemies’ behaviors. For example, I summarized “Sub-Saharan black people” as being thievish. I believe the “taking of what belongs to another” is a core motivating principle for Black people’s behavior.
I draw this conclusion based on extensive observations of black behavior in Sub-Saharan countries, especially around the local markets of Kenya, Uganda or Nigeria. Since black people, due to apparent cognitive incompetencies, have trouble converting their resources into modern finished goods, they are stuck at the level of “taking and grabbing” what others have made.
When Germany, in a display of affectionate kindness, decided to return certain bronze artifacts that belonged to Benin, the artifacts, upon their return, were immediately lost to “private collections”. In other words, the objects were melted down, and the bronze was likely sold on the open market.
This event is explained by the above theory: Black people don’t care to preserve artifacts for a museum audience. They don’t “give back”. They just care to “get the money out”.


It also explains why Black people insist that Europeans “stole their resources”. As a people of theft, Blacks can only explain the world in terms of their own most base behavior. It’s psychological projection.
Needless to say, White people didn’t steal Africa’s resources. Firstly, resource-wise, Africa is the poorest continent on the planet (always has been). And secondly, most of Africa’s resources are still buried in Africa. Thirdly, China has robbed Africa of far more resources than Europeans ever have.
China has robbed Africa in a deceptive manner by promising Africans new harbors and airports in exchange for resource contracts, meanwhile indebting Africans to the Chinese economy.
White Supremacy
The feared ‘White Supremacy’ is an accidental by-product of White people’s giving nature. By allowing others to take central stage, we made them feel important, making it enjoyable for others to be around us. By allowing others to take what they wanted first, we secured repeat business. And by allowing others to profess their aggressive religions in our countries, we secured lucrative contracts for their resources.
But being giving can be taken too far. It becomes harmful to ourselves when we weaken our boundaries. White naïveté is the shadow side to our kind and forgiving nature. We don’t need to become thievish or rapist, however, to defend ourselves against thieves and rapists. All we need to do is become masters of game theory who play tit-for-tat.
Let us, therefore, cash in on all the accusations of White Supremacy and truly become the White Supremacy. We shall repay selfishness with selfishness, rape with devastation (since we don’t really want to touch their women), and theft with superior competence.
And to those who are giving, we shall be giving, too.
Dear Johannes
Your food for thought, “grain of salt” passage is quite an interesting description.
May I offer several additional adjectives to your section describing Jews : they are precisely Genocidal maniacs, thieves and rapists.
I don’t comment in jest but the regime has explicitly shown their true colours live on TV in glorious technicolour.
The Israeli Jew was welcomed into Africa and now Uriah Heap has wrung his slimy hands in elation at the billions of dollars diamond trade extraction in the Congo. They are born grabbers all acquired from their creepy brainwashed education.
One further point I would like to explore is the might of the Chinese not only plundering resources in Africa, but they are instrumental in plundering the bauxite (aluminium) from the land in Jamaica. Due to heavy equipment on the ground, the fertile land where excavation has taken place, has been turned to a burnt orange desert exposing the bauxite.
And in turn the filthy dust from excavation sites has caused contamination of the water table and had an adverse affect on the health of the locals eg respiratory issues, cancer. All approved by the Jamaican Government.
The only resistance has been from local campaigners namely the Marooners, whom have great knowledge of their land in finite detail.
Americans: I must add my thoughts from a personal perspective.
The Yanks I know, as personal friends are the most selfish and self-entitled individuals I know. They love money, investments and assets - gold and silver and diamonds.
Yankees are the greatest Belligerents that ever existed on this earth. I am talking about the upper middle to upper classes. They are gypsies, tramps, thieves and foreign land grabbers, and strive for endless wars in the Middle East.
The warmest, most genuine and affectionate people are Italians. Greeks, Brazilian - southern Europe and Levant - eg Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran.