Humanity's Multi-Origin Thesis Revisited

Polygenism & Convergent Evolution

Did small-brained, tropical fruit-eating migrants from Eastern Africa really displace and replace the hardier, big-brained, meat-eating Neanderthal apex predators in Europe? No, of course not. Modern scientists just prefer promoting migration stories over evolution’s reality, for political reasons.

Are Europeans Neanderthals?

In Europe, we’ve found the skeletal remains of men and women with varying degrees of Neanderthal ancestry, from 2% to 8% to 16% and to 50%, depending on how far back we go. But all scientists mistakenly, and automatically, conclude this means Neanderthals somehow mixed with migrating Sapiens and were then largely replaced by them.

This is the thing that always surprises me about evolutionary biologists. Whenever the scholars uncover new shapes of skulls buried in Europe’s caves, they speak of “migrations” and “mixing”—but never of evolution. They never say that this one type of skull evolved into this other type of skull. They rather assume migrations.

So, don’t the scientists believe in evolution at all? Evolution equally explains why modern Europeans became ‘less Neanderthal’ over time. It’s because Neanderthals evolved into modern Europeans! Their DNA gradually changed in response to selection pressures.

That’s why we’re now down to “2% Neanderthal DNA” for the average European. Not because we mixed with African Sapiens, but because our DNA changed. It’s called evolution. And I argue that humanity evolved from at least three separate origins, but later converged into looking more similar.

The AI summary of “convergent evolution”, according to Google Gemini, is as follows:

“The independent evolution of similar features in distinct lineages … is a well-documented example of convergent evolution. This phenomenon occurs when similar traits arise in different species due to shared environmental pressures or selective advantages, even if the species are not closely related.”

Bing, bing, bong! Even if the species are not closely related, they can develop very similar features—both in appearance and in ability.

As hominids became more globally connected (threatening each other's territories), different human species converged over time as we experienced the same shared environmental pressures, despite not being even remotely related.

Different groups of humans then ended up having similar genes for similar traits, not because we inherited these from migrations, but because we independently evolved the same features. This isn’t very hard to understand.

Out of Africa, Out of Asia? No, Polygenism

So, what if I told you White Europeans developed from Neanderthals, East Asians evolved from Homo Erectus and/or Homo Denisova, and Sub-Saharan West Africans came from Homo Ergaster and/or Homo Habilis?

Indeed, some African hominids did venture into South-Eastern Europe and the Middle East, but then died out without leaving any genetic legacy. The latest Chinese research proves: White Europeans today carry almost negligible to zero amounts of African DNA. The Out of Africa theory is a hoax. Europeans and Asians simply don’t descend from Africans.

But some Chinese scholars, such as professor Shi Huang, have given humanity’s origin a new twist. They now claim that early man evolved from vegetarian Homo Erectus living in Eastern Asia. This early man then allegedly migrated to Europe and Africa to become a global Sapiens species.

Here, we have to pause for a moment. Perhaps Chinese authorities want people to believe China was the origin of humanity. Of course. The idea fits neatly into China’s self-conception as the center of the world. China, or Zhong-guo, literally means: Middle Kingdom.

Instead of falling for yet another scam, replacing Out-of-Asia for Out-of-Africa, I’m here to revive humanity’s multiple origin thesis, or the polygenic theory.

That theory says each of the big three races developed independently of one another. Whites, blacks, and Asian are technically three separate species as different as orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees, that each then evolved to be more similar due to convergent evolution and small migratory influxes (from all directions to all directions).

My Hypothesis

Here’s my theory of what happened to White people:

• White people’s distant ancestors aren’t from Africa, but from West Eurasia;

• Our ancestors are Neanderthals and their ancestors Homo Antecessor, who’d been living in Europe for over a million years;

• They were apex predators living off of a diet of mostly meat (animal protein and fat);

• However, having hunted big game to extinction, having faced many ice ages (pushing them South each time, into Homo Erectus territory), and upon confrontations with other migratory hominids (Homo Habilis), Neanderthals were forced into other food niches—i.e., Neanderthals began eating more plant foods to supplement their diet;

• In competition with Asian migrants from the Far East (vegetarian Homo Erectus from present-day China), we mixed slightly and further changed and adapted;

• The sequential adoption of plant food, farming, and grain ultimately physically weakened the apex predators, and transformed Neanderthals into modern-looking White Europeans, i.e., a domesticated version of a predator;

• During this process of evolution that took place during the past 50,000 years, Neanderthals’ teeth changed, it reduced our brain size, the brow-ridge diminished (but not quite disappeared since North European Whites still have the inset eyes), our sloping foreheads straightened quite a bit (for advanced planning, needed for agriculture), and stocky rib cages made way for more agriculture-friendly poses;

• All this happened due to convergent evolution (forcing us to be more like vegetarian hominids in order to compete);

• Different groups of Europeans evolved differently. North Europeans retained their appetite for meat and dairy. They became milk tolerant dairy farmers, and have always been Europe’s fiercest warriors, often acquired as mercenaries by everyone else in the region;

• The Basque people, due to their isolated habitat, are still closer related to the Neanderthals (less evolutionary change);

• Other people in the Middle East have retained stronger Neanderthal features (such as possibly Jews, certain Iraqi, and certain Eastern/Southern Turkish people).

The Into-Africa Theory

I conclude that the main reason why Neanderthals evolved into European Sapiens is that Neanderthals were forced to start eating more plant food, ultimately succumbing to being domesticated by agriculture. The same thing happened to Homo Erectus in China.

These modern humans from Eurasia then ventured into Africa, where their females were most likely raped by Homo Habilis and/or Homo Ergaster, ultimately producing modern West Africans as offspring.