Why didn’t China fight to get the “deal” India now got from the European Union? It involves mass migration of up to 20 million Indian workers—mostly unmarried males. Chinese society apparently has no need for these millions of gifted, talented workers. If this doesn’t make any sense, it’s because the deal isn’t meant to benefit Europe. We were forced to enter a deal with India in order to get Indians on our side in the coming NATO war against China.
The USA, too, is suffering from the Indian Intifada. I’ve long suspected that U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance is Indian. Perhaps I’m wrong, or perhaps he just looks very white and loves changing his legal name frequently for no reason. Perhaps his whiteness is courtesy of the Aryan invader genes that once became India’s upper caste. Vance’s move to support Vivek Ramaswamy’s bid to become the governor of Ohio, however, stinks of the well-known Indian nepotism that guides that people’s actions.
Europe’s suicidal “India Deal” now comes after years of Americans pushing for their own Indian invasion. When Elon Musk in late December 2024 argued that the USA couldn’t continue existing without millions of skilled Indian laborers pouring into the country, the tech billionaire supported calling white opponents “retards.” (The word “retard,” meanwhile, is now one of the forbidden words on X that gets your post automatically censored, along with the words “tranny,” “faggot,” and “nigger.”)
American corporations abused the expanded H-1B visa scheme to stop hiring white men in favor of cheaper Indians. Despite the diploma mills running overtime, a majority of the so-called ingenious Indian migrants to the USA never lived up to their résumés. Many, if not most, ended up working as Deliveroo drivers, cooks, and cleaners when the economy was screaming for high-IQ AI developers.
It’s no different in European countries such as Germany or the Netherlands. European tech industries are crying out for hundreds of thousands more skilled workers, but the leftist politicians in charge keep hallucinating that Third World laborers will somehow match the required skills. They don’t. Barely 75% of migrants who’ve arrived in the Netherlands in the past five years have found work, after having been awarded free housing and monthly benefits for at least three years.
Instead of concluding that migrants coming in don’t possess the required skills, the race card is pulled. Media, journalists, and politicians join in unison to condemn the “racist” commercial entities that, despite suffering debilitating shortages, somehow refuse to hire foreign talent. The other conclusion—that perhaps foreigners don’t have the required talents—is scoffed at, if it is even mentioned at all.
My impression of the immigration system is as follows: Western companies are indeed in need of specific, high-IQ, and well-trained talent. However, companies also overstate these needs in order to appear economically healthy compared to competitors—namely to win government contracts, subsidies, and internally to win departmental budget approvals.
When politicians hear the phrase “labor shortages,” however, they seem to think that any quality of human body will suffice. So, politics brings in random mutts and retards from the Third World. A majority of these appear to have no qualifications whatsoever, which completely defeats the purpose of immigration. We were supposed to do immigration in order to avoid having to educate our own, since education is expensive. We were supposed to get fully trained and educated workers out of a box, so they could be employed and start paying taxes, preferably from day one.
Instead, what we’ve got are welfare dependents bringing in their extended families through family reunification deals. We’ve created a new underclass of totally untalented and uneducated people who don’t even possess the capacity for learning another language, which forces our society to “wait it out” for at least one more generation in order to have employables who can speak the local tongue. Then why—why?!—didn’t we invest in families of our own? Why didn’t we spend all this money spent on integration on funding native-grown families instead?
There is no logic to it. In Europe’s case, we’ve seen mass migration coming in from Morocco, Turkey, the Middle East, other North African nations, Central Africa, people from former colonies such as Indonesia, and so on. All of these different groups of people have brought with them insurmountable problems: low cognitive ability, low IQs, general retardation, weird diseases once thought cured (such as scurvy and whooping cough), and many cultural enrichments previously unknown to Western man, such as gang rape, genital mutilation, child marriage, and honor killings.
And now we’re getting millions of Indians on top of all that. Indian culture, it turns out, is the least trustworthy, per a recent global survey. Indians are more likely to scam other people, especially people outside of their immediate blood relatives. The Indian worldview, as we have had the misfortune of finding out, is one of ripping and robbing left and right, and putting cousins and brothers—if not their mothers—in charge of businesses, banks, and other operations.
They work hard, yes, but they don’t work for you.
As the USA is now phasing out the Indian enigma, Europe proffered itself to do the India Deal. I suspect that Europe’s unelected dictator, Ursula von der Leyen, may very well be an American spy, and that her dealings with India will most likely favor the U.S. economy before any European one. The USA will be able to sell energy, materials, goods, and services to Europe, while Europe will import tens of millions of new customers and dependents. This way, the USA can make money without having to carry the burden of integrating unintegrables.
Do we really need India on our side against China? I say India will pull the rug from under the West and side with China anyway. This is all a geopolitical joke. A big mistake. Our leaders are idiots, and our people will suffer.