Diversity Is the American Achilles Heel
From Republic to Monarchy?
Over 90% of the so-called Islamophobic slurs on Western social media were uttered by immigrants from India. Our Indian arrivals are generally Hindu people who deeply hate the Muslims living in India. Muslims, in turn, are largely responsible for anti-Semitic attacks. Moreover, around 15% of all anti-Semitic attacks in the USA were committed by a single man—a Jew.
Yet the CNN-led media keep pointing fingers at white men, as though whites were responsible for all of these “hate crimes”. Anchors show graphics on screen proving the increased anti-minority sentiment but they neglect to mention it’s largely minorities attacking one another. Black male shooters are still responsible for over 80% of the gun-related deaths of other black men.
In Europe, too, similar ethnic conflicts have been imported. Kurdish immigrants hate Turkish immigrants. Turkish immigrants, though equally Muslim, generally don’t socialize with Moroccon immigrants. Arab Moroccans hate Berber Moroccans. Berber Moroccans hate Algerian Berbers. And so on, and so forth.
Diversity isn’t a strenght, it’s a disorder.
In a revealing interview with Daniel Natal, on the Geopolitics & Empire podcast, Natal explains how Republics (such as the USA) historically tend to fail due to inner strife. In a monarchy, the people know the King is to blame. But who exactly takes on that kind of responsibility in a Republic? Without foreign wars to vent frustrations, Republics tend to turn on themselves.
Indeed, the USA has been involved in over 80% of all global wars waged since 1945. Barring just 3 years of peace since its birth, one might argue that the USA needs to be at war all of the time in order to distract from the ethnic and racial tensions building up within its own borders.
Surely, there must be a reason why the mainstream media systematically ignore black-on-white crime? (Same in Western Europe.) If the people were informed about their violent displacement, for profit, the people would revolt. But, says Natal, no complex system escapes death by entropy. Meaning, no complex system lives on forever, not even global systems.
In case of the USA, it is likely that its internal racial problems will collapse the economy. Diversity is proving to be its greatest liability.
I foresee that possibly three new nations might arise: In the South-East, the place of the former plantations, a Negroe-led nation may emergy that will be in a state of constant tribal warfare. In the South-West, a Catholic nation for Hispanic and Latino people (and for white refugees if they are accepted). In the North, a Protestant White rural nation surrounding the Indian-dominated big cities.
The big cities will decline rapidly and won’t be able to sustain their populations. Likely, they will eventually starve. According to the book Strategic Relocation, it’s best to stay at least 200 miles away from big cities, and especially away from highways. Once shit hits the fan, urban refugees will take their cars out to the countryside. They will stop wherever their batteries run out.
Why not throw in a Mormon-Amish war for religious dominance in the rural territories? Yet, oOut of this mess, the nation-state shall make a comeback. It will happen in Western Europe as well, but people will be become separated once again along religious and racial lines. Nations, after all, care only for their people, not for random foreigners.
This transformation is likely going to be extremely bloody. The idea of the USA as a sort of global Wal-Mart where everyone is welcome simply cannot be maintained. As a European, I advise white men of the USA to start learning how to communicate with the resistance without the use of electricity. And how to hide food supplies from hungry refugees fleeing the cities.