Communism versus the Patriarchy

The Origins of Two Arch Enemies

Communism has always been rich people's attempt at structuring society in a way that they hoped ordinary men wouldn’t try to overthrow. It’s an old-women’s cult meant to emasculate virile men who pose a threat to the Granny State.

Under communism, people are trapped in a cult that wants to take people's personal wealth away from them, so they can neither revolt nor resist. Communists want to make your children the property of the State, too, so that the children will turn against their own parents, instead of against the rich.

The idea that there are no rich people allowed under communism is not historically accurate. In Soviet Russia, there were plenty of rich families who had it better than the common man. The caveat is that you had to be friends with the government.

Banks, for example, issued two types of paper currency. One that did not degrade, which was issued to the friends of the government, and another made with paper that crumbled into a thousand pieces within two to three years, and this was issued to poor people.

This meant that the poor people couldn't save any money. They had to spend everything or watch it crumble and disappear. Without savings, you can't invest. Without investments, you remain a slave of the state handout system. What is communism, then, if not a system run by rich people meant to keep potential competitors poor?

When modern governments dream of digital currencies that they can program to self-destruct, we are not hearing of a new idea. It is a very old idea tried again with new technology. The idea is to keep humanity poor and enslaved to the state, like small children attached to their mothers.

The Communist State fears independence, especially from independent males, and so it ridicules the ideas of freedom and self-determination.

Under such restrictive economics, the old Soviet peasants, however, invented a new kind of currency: namely, by brewing and bottling vodka. An unopened bottle of vodka keeps its taste for about one hundred years, and so, people started paying the roofer and the bicycle repairman with vodka instead of with currency.

Our world has always seen the struggle between the old and the young, between old women trying to suck their society dry as their skin, and virile young men looking to escape the dying Granny State.

In The Netherlands, the government has recently passed a law that allows the State to seize anyone's assets and savings without even a court order. They say it's just for going after illicit gains from criminals, but the same law can also be used to strip any man or woman who refuses to go to war for the State.

For example, stripped of your wealth, if you can no longer afford to buy food, you'll have to join the army. Every resourceful man, father, or husband can now watch his life's work be seized by the State if it deems one's personal success in life to have caused others too much inequality.

The Netherlands, today, of course, is already a totalitarian communist State, and anyone who isn't a mentally feeble toddler will want to throw the communists in jail. Nevertheless, the EU will want to replicate this Dutch “success story” in every EU country, and then in every country in the world, as per the Open Society doctrine.

This then brings us to the story of the origins of the patriarchy. The majority of the world is and always has been matriarchal, including Asia, India, the Islamic world, and Africa. However, Europeans and their descendants are the largest patriarchal group. Patriarchy comes in several watered down forms, but the most patriarchal societies today, meaning authoritarian patriarchies, are the Germanic world, Japan, and Quebec, Canada.

In an authoritarian patriarchy, traditionally, the firstborn son inherits the father's wealth. Wealth is passed down along the fathers, and this is why machismo or muscle are not the determinants of what makes a patriarchy.

In a matriarchal system, the women control and inherit the family's (or communities) wealth. Despite displays of machismo, notice how many non-European men are deeply in love with their own mothers, more than even with their own wives?

The matriarchal men will even argue with you online that, of course, men should love their mothers like that. But in Europe, this is called incestuous and a mental disorder. Among our peoples, men are supposed to grow up and cut loose from the mother in order to become independent actors.

The matriarchy is the basis for communism, so here's the reason why Western globalists are so in love with immigration from India, the Muslim world, and Africa. Globalists are importing people already accustomed to a matriarchal system. And when they become electoral majorities, they will vote in communism applied to every facet of society.

So, where did patriarchies come from, then? They came from Steppe pastoralism, from men roaming the grassy plains around the Eurasian continent, all the way from Ireland through Northern Europe to Southern Russia, Mongolia, Siberia, and up to Japan.

Here, our ancestors escaped settled societies ruled by women. Here, on horseback, the men were in charge. Since their only property, their cattle, was mobile and could be stolen overnight, the men formed alliances called Männerbünde (bands of men) to help protect each other's cattle.

Due to their nomadic lifestyle, and owing to their time away from their wives, out on the planes, a culture of monogamy became the norm. To secure the loyalty of the women, wealth began being transferred from father to son, rather than from mothers to daughters.

Once these great races settled down, they often became the elite aristocracy of the settled farmers they conquered. Their culture became dominant and transformed Europe.

But, as luxury life has made strongmen weak, so has the European patriarchy weakened. It is time, therefore, to plan the escape: to find territories we may return to as the conditions of settled society become too inhospitable to our freer natures.

It's time to say goodbye and break up with modernity. Wherever we go next, we will live free, and we’ll watch the big cities crumble from afar, laughing at the peasants trapped in them.