
The state of Italy made “femicide”, the murder of women (apparently for no other reason than the victim being female) a separate class of crime carrying a life sentence. This follows after Ursula von der Leyen (the unelected EU Dictatrix) tweeted about the need for women “to live without fear”, and the United Nations tweeting that “online harassment is violence” (it literally isn’t) that “disproportionately affects women & girls”.
Online harassment may indeed affect women and girls, since women and girls are the ones most likely to harass other women and girls online. But what is it with the power elites’ sudden obsession with sex-specific (don’t say gender-specific) laws and rights, all of a sudden denying that we’re all equal?
Recently, in The Netherlands, there was a case of a Nigerian “refugee” (there is no war in Nigeria) who fled to our country and, out of the blue, stabbed a white girl (“Lisa”, not her real name, 17) to death in an apparent rape-attempt murder. Suspiciously, our media instantly launched a campaign imploring women to “seize back the night” with highly coordinated marketing materials blaming men for “femicide” (the mysterious murder of women for being women). In fact, our TV programming went into overdrive, insisting that “locker-room talk” lies as the heart of men looking to murder women, for no other reason than that they are women.
No one cares about the utterly depraved dehumanization of men by this feminist skit propaganda. But then something happened. People started looking up the actual rape and murder stats from our national bureau of statistics (the CBS). And lo, we found that over 60% of rapists and murderers are men with an immigrant background, namely first or second generation. However, if we were to include third and fourth generation immigrants, the stats show over 80% of murderers and rapists in our country are men of foreign origin. The actual number of blond, blue-eyed White rapists named Hans is—surprisingly?—extremely low and, in fact, rare.
It’s not “men” doing the killing and raping of Dutch women. It’s immigrant men (in particular, immigrant with below-average IQs and higher likelihoods of substance abuse such as drugs, alcohol, Viagra, or steroids), but since most of these men have now either acquired a Dutch passport or have been given a residence permit, they count as “Dutch”, at least on paper. Our people in media can’t bring themselves to admit to these facts. That’s because admission of these facts undermines the anti-man narratives so carefully crafted by our militant feminist overlords.
Meanwhile, Britain and other formerly modern nations are thinking of adding female-only train carriages. Don’t call it Islamization because they’ll call you an Islamophobe. Still, it is Islamization. The European Union’s policy appears to be the adoption of Islamic homosexual segregation. Soon, we should expect separated entrances to supermarkets for men and women. Just two, of course, since there’s no budget for accommodating any of the hundreds of different made-up genders.
I have two explanations as to why the anti-man narratives are flaring up. The first is geopolitical, the second psychological. Geopolitically speaking, the European Union has long decided that it should ally itself with Islam (Turkey, the Middle East, and Arab nations) in order to fight Russia. Submitting to aggressive Muslims who hate everything about the West is apparently a better idea than to think Tchaikovsky or Tolstoy are better representatives of European culture than the present European bureaucrats and their warped, vile minds.
Psychologically speaking, I’m thinking that Western (White) women are having a collective mental breakdown. The globalism that was supposed to secure their wealth for ages to come hasn’t delivered. The growing demands for luxury from Eastern and Southern middle classes (China, India, Africa) is leaving Europe increasingly impoverished. The White female psyche experiences this as “violence”, in the same manner that “online harassment” is violence. Namely, it’s not. The West’s declining grip on global wealth doesn’t constitute violence in any way, but the slipping away of luxury hoards from the clutches of cold White women’s hands is taxing their psychology to the max.
I’m not taking sides here. If we like our wealth, we should defend it, not by allying with Islam, buy by declaring war on the world, including on Islam. And if we should do away with our materialism, perhaps, unburdened by what has been, we might be able to fight harder and even win that war.
Until then, the perceived “violence against women” will only be used as a justification to send men to the frontlines.

