Are Half of Boys Autistic?

The Feminist Shift

Under the influence of feminism, words in our languages have been given subtle and subversive new meanings. It is necessary to uncover the feminist misuse of language, for they point toward potential grave crimes being committed against boys and men.

Calling a mass murder a ‘special treatment’ is what historians would now call a ‘Nazi euphemism’. But today’s feminists also misuse language, and in more subtle, sinister ways. I call it the feminist shift (from semantic shift). In particular, I will explore the feminist shift in meaning of the words autistic and autocratic.

‘Autistic’

I used to understand the word autistic as meaning someone incapable of human communication. An artist was someone with clear developmental retardation.

This traditional condition of autism differs, starkly, from people with very high IQs who may feel so annoyed with average people that they prefer no communication. That’s not the same as being unable to communicate.

Autism was defined by an incapacity. But the feminist shift in meaning of the word autism has led to the following bizarre observations:

If, in the 1950s, a boy displayed typical boyish behavior, he was called a “real boy” or a “boy’s boy”. By the 1990s, that same boy would have been called “willfully disobedient”. And by the 2020s, doctors would give the boy an autism diagnosis!

This isn’t right. Almost 20-30% of American boys, for example, are given the diagnosis of autism. And in Sweden, they say it’s up to 50%. I’m not buying it, and I’m also not buying vaccinations as the cause. It’s also not up to an improved sensitivity of testing for autism.

It’s none of that. Rather, the diagnoses are wrong. That many boys simply don’t have autism. At all. Despite many a teenager on TikTok claiming to have autism. Since the autism doesn’t show up (as they are communicatively gifted teens), they’ve called it “high-masking autism”.

Calling yourself a high-masking autistic is another way of saying you simply don’t have autism.

So, what is going on? Well, the feminist shift changed the meaning of what autism is. Autism is no longer regarded an incapacity, but merely the possession of a free will and the ability to make one’s own decisions.

Basically, any boy capable of displaying signs of making his own life choices is now considered a threat to the feminist-communist authority that demands absolute obedience to the totalitarian state.

The willfully disobedient boy, the later virile man, has become such a problem to feminist society, that his free will must be neutered.

What better way than to diagnose state threats as “autistics” (who believe they may freely deviate from state authority), and then to medicate them with medicine designed to remove their agency?

‘Autocratic’

The same feminist shift happened to the word “autocratic”. When the Hungarian leader Viktor Orbán denounced EU-wide calls for sanctions against Russia (because his country still depends on Russian gas via the Turk Stream pipeline to get through the winter), Western media called Orbán autocratic.

Traditionally, autocracy means self-rule, and an autocrat is a dictator who doesn’t even listen to his advisors. But that’s not what Orbán is. Premier Orbán of Hungary is a man who listens very much to the political reality around him.

Orbán pays attention to the reality of his country’s energy situations. And he is a democrat who listens to the people’s vote (Hungarians voted against war with Russia, against sanctions, and against mass immigration into their country).

These are not the behaviors of a traditional autocrat. They are the behaviors of a sensible man who can think for himself. If anything, more European leaders should defy the very autistic ideologues of the European Union, who are tone-deaf and politically blind.

Neutering the Threat

It is neither “autocratic” nor “autistic” to defy totalitarian cults. Feminism is a totalitarian cult that wants to remove male agency. It wants to render males to unquestioningly obedient slaves, like happy babies.

Feminism deeply resents and hates men who grow up and become independent actors, for independent action always poses a threat to the survival of the totalitarian state.

It is imperative, therefore, that men fight their false diagnoses. Fight the medication of normal boyish behavior. Put an end to the attack on male agency. And throw feminism out the door.