AI Is a Failed God

There is no better modern equivalent to the story of Lucifer, the fallen angel, than installing an AI chatbot to be a member of the Albanian Parliament.

Under the apparent influence of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and with bribes from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, Albania reluctantly welcomed an AI-bot to be help rule its country. The AI-bot was obviously programmed by Anglo-American powers, not by the Chinese or the Russians, begging whether “rule by AI” was always going to be the most important feature.

This AI charade, however, cannot be sustained for much longer than AI is able to fool people into thinking it is intelligent. I am hinting that AI will prove to be a fad. I do not believe people will put up with de facto American rule in their country under the guise of an AI dressed like granny Babushka.

A while back, I suggested renaming AI from “artificial intelligence” to “automated instruction”, for AI is really a robotic teacher that doesn’t check its answers. It’s still up to human to decide what to make of AI outputs, especially the outputs scraped off of leftist New York Times articles and CIA-controlled Wikipedia.

Free information has, for a long time, meant your free access to information, but it has never meant that the information you were consuming was somehow established in a free or honest manner.

For now, the widespread AI slop garnering millions of likes on TikTok and Instagram betrays only two things. 1) It betrays the low IQ human prompter, and 2) it betrays the low IQ human audience applauding its outputs. Grandma didn’t really feed Bruno the brown bear for the 8th winter in a row, but, judging from the comments under such videos, a very large share of humans either can’t figure out that grandma’s video was fake.

Readers commented that the sort of people now falling for AI videos are the same ones who once fell for Orson Welles radio adaptation of H.G. Wells War of the Worlds. I’d argue that they’re the same people who fell for state and corporate scams since time immemorial, such as the natives of faraway lands who thought White people were White gods who had returned as prophesied.

It turns out that ordinary people may question words, but they won’t question visuals.

Still, I’ve been able to note several issues with AI generated videos. AI video generators appear to still have trouble 1) realistically generating appropriate camera shakiness, for example for police bodycams, 2) realistically simulating gravity. But AI video’s dead giveaway appears to be the general cluelessness and unresponsiveness of humans dedicated in critical situations. And that is because these humans don’t have a soul.

AI-generated human characters don’t respond appropriately with the sort of reflexes and baked-in emotions real humans tend to display.

In my view, AI is a gimmick, but also a failed god. As early as the 1970s and even before that, we have been shown TV episodes of space travel shows featuring talking computers. Whether HAL-9000 or Star Trek’s onboard computer, these talking “AI” voices invariably offered an allure of perfect knowledge—unless, of course, they were hit with undisclosed malfunctions, in which case the all-knowing computers went rogue.

The more troubling view of such human-like but calculating computer beings is that we, humans, have been programmed to believe them. For decades, TV shows and movies have been preparing us to buy into the scam that is “global governance”, i.e., the day humanity must submit to some kind of AI algorithm that “knows what’s best for us”, as though it were our god.

The Davos globalists might indeed want to give the world a female machine goddess, a deus ex machina, as they are experimenting with in Albania. The reality is that AI, so far, has been overwhelmingly unimpressive.