The war in Ukraine has more to do with Ukrainian grain than with Russia’s territorial claims. The West needs Ukraine in order to feed Africa and keep bribing Africans to give up their resources. But Russia and China are undermining the Western power base.
Indeed, in the grand play of things, the war at the Russian border is really about the transfer of the West’s African colonies to new masters: Russia and China. By making Africa dependent on Russian food exports rather than—as is presently the case— Western exports, Russia hopes to win Africa over.
(According to the United Nations, Africa imports 85% of its food, mainly from the West.)
So let’s see what Western intellectuals are saying. Reading Foreign Policy magazine often betrays that our intellectuals are living in a bubble. In their bubble, the West is still winning, and Russia and China are always losing.
However, in an article titled, China Doesn’t Compartmentalize, we catch a glimpse of intellectual despair. It turns out that, unlike the West, China couldn’t care less about the material well-being of humanity, and is merely striving to rule the world at all costs:
Beijing continues to engage in what it has referred to as “unrestricted warfare,” […] China, in other words, seeks to restore global supremacy primarily out of a sense of historical fulfillment, rather than for material gains. […] Hence, unlike the postwar United States, China would willingly embrace a less prosperous, less stable, and less predictable world—as long as it retains the top seat.
China doesn’t care about global prosperity. It cares about power. Western elites, of course, also don’t care about global prosperity, but they do care very much about their own material well-being (and kids on Epstein’s island).
The West has grown addicted to materialism, and it is through the lure of material greed that Western thinkers hope to attract the demographically young populations of Africa and the Middle East, i.e., to financially enslave them.
The West’s model is a model of human exploitation, namely by playing young men’s desires to win the material wealth needed in order to win over good-looking women.
But modern life in the West has become a mostly artificial competition, one of online prostitution exchanged for worthless dollars. No emotions are exchanged.
While China is playing hardball, Hollywood is trying desperately to win over African populations with transgender dwarfs ruining the new Snow White remake, also played by a brown actress, immediately after bombing The Little Mermaid and Cleopatra.
If this is how U.S. leaders expect to win over African hearts and minds, they must not think very highly of Africans to serve them with regurgitated, low-class versions of German and Danish fairytales, and sheepishly pretend that West Africans built ancient Egypt.
Playing into the narcissism of an already extremely narcissistic black demographic may prove catastrophic. What did you think “diversity” was really about? It was always about replacing working-class white people with working-class blacks, all in order to keep a tab on Africa’s resources.
And that’s where the crackdown on alleged “white supremacism” comes from. The rich politicians north of Richmond don’t want to see ordinary white people get organized against the treason committed against them by their own state.
An armed revolt of white men against their Western leadership may indeed pose the greatest threat to U.S. hegemony. But it may also pave the way for a return to traditional life rooted in religion, away from the lure of materialism and temporary luxury.
To preserve a future for Western people, the U.S.-led Western world may need to revise its dominant strategy of materialism in favor of ‘German idealism’: the old-fashioned idea that God is more important than matter.