We’re never going to travel to other stars, not even to the nearest one, Proxima Centauri. If we could fly there at light speed, it would take about four years there, and four years back. At present technology levels, however, it would take at least 60,000 years to get there. Elon Musk primarily invented xAI (Grok) to help invent better spacecraft engines—because human physicists appear incapable of advancing spacefaring technology. But even if we focused on the Moon and Mars first, the energy logistics simply don’t add up.

To carry cargo into space, you will need a rocket big enough to get it off of Earth’s gravity. The greater the cargo you wish to carry, the more the costs of the rocket and its fuels will increase exponentially. So there’s going to be an optimum: there will be a certain optimal size of spacecraft, cargo bay, and rocket where the fuel and operating costs will match the best sizes for a single trip.

And let me tell you something: That mathematically optimal size isn’t anywhere near good enough to make repeat space hauls economically viable, unless there’s oil on Mars (there isn’t). Even exploring our local solar system will prove to be a cost so high that humanity will not care to bear it. People promoting star travel and space fictions as a new religion for people to “believe in” are dangerously unethical technocrats.

Read more

The 1964 book by Dutch germanologist Jan de Vries The Spiritual World of the Germanic Peoples (not available in English yet, but for sale in German here) may well be the best psychoanalysis of the Germanic man. In six chapters following a basic outline of the book, De Vries captures the Germanic ideals of honor, freedom, the law, the self, artform, and magic.

The Germanic peoples were strong personalities, wrote De Vries, not despite their boundness to an all-obligating totality, but precisely through this binding. The book comes in a red leather binding, and I realized the red skin is a reference to the Rauðskinna, a lost Icelandic book of magic also called the Book of Power. De Vries being his day’s top scholar on Old Norse literature would have undoubtedly know about it.

Read more

Why are countries such as Britain, Ireland, or even the USA so eager to put people straight out of Africa into positions of high power, influence, and authority? It has something to do with the geopolitics of George Orwell’s 1984, fiction becoming reality.

Take, for example, Helen Ogbu, a Nigerian-born woman who became mayor of Galway, Ireland. Or think of Kemi Badenoch, who is the leader of the Conservatives in the UK Parliament. Her mother was Nigerian, and the only reason Kemi became British was because her mother gave birth to her in a British hospital.

Then there’s Miatta Fahnbulleh, straight from Liberia, who is now the UK Energy Secretary. And, of course, there was the black man David Lammy, the former Vice Premier of the UK, whose parents came from Guyana. And besides many of such black pawns being positioned onto the Anglo chessboard, there are the numerous Pakistani, Indian, and various Muslim appointees to positions of high influence.

Read more

I would like to start discussing more right-wing books, because I believe right-wingers nowadays read more than the leftists do, and it’s a great way to truly radicalize people with intense content. Such as It Cannot Be Stormed by Ernst son Salomon.

Von Salomon, the author, is remembered in Germany as a right-wing terrorist, as he played a small role in the successful assassination of the liberal industrialist Walter Rathenau (a Jew), somewhere around the 1920s, 1922, after World War I. Von Salomon recruited the hitcar driver for the machine-gun assassination.

The author also fought in World War I against the Soviet army and later joined Organization Council, a movement that wanted to create or start a conservative revolution in Germany, meaning to do away with the liberal socialist bullshit, and return people to more traditional ways of living.

And that’s what the book is also about. I won’t give you the full plot or the synopsis, but you have to imagine that the book starts out describing rural German populations who come into contact with the growing powers of the bureaucratic city. The city is simply represented as a faceless mass. And there’s a struggle.

The protagonist, which is really Von Salomon himself, ends up living in the city and he starts looking there for reactionary friends. He starts joining all sorts of organizations, even the National Socialist Party, of which he in real life was indeed a member.

But he finds out that all these urban parties, even the communists, don’t really care about the struggles of the farmers in the countryside. They just wish to use the farmer’s struggles as a way of winning power for themselves, but never with the intent of actually improving the situation of the farmers.

This all, in my view, fits a German tradition, namely: Germans never really liked living in cities. Some say the Nordic-Germanic human type does not belong to live in major cities, for the conditions are not conducive to our soul and body. For example, it wasn’t until the late 1800s that the city of Berlin reached one million inhabitants. Compare that to the city of Rome, which achieved this around the time of Julius Caesar, almost 2000 years earlier.

Germanic elites also used to think of cities as places so destitute that you wouldn’t even want to imprison your prisoners of war there. Nowadays, big cities are where we dump our massive African and Middle-Eastern populations. I think this is telling. The cities are a place for subhumans, not for the healthy “Aryan” who needs physical exercise in fresh air to thrive.

And I myself feel this also very strongly. I hate big cities and I can’t stand them. Cities are narrow, loud, and they hide the horizon. I prefer living somewhere I don’t need to pay a tourist fee to see the sun set at the horizon. I should be able to walk out into a field and see the sun rise whenever I want to.

The German saying goes, “Hilft dir selbst, so hilft dir Gott”. If you help yourself, then God will help you. The book by Hermann Löns describes a violent German peasant guerilla outfit going after murderous soldiers during the 30 Years War (17th century).

Called the Warwulf in English, or Der Wehrwolf (the defender-wolf) in German, the novel focuses on protagonist Harm Wulf, a farmer whose blond ancestors came from further North and settled down in Lower Saxony, which is Northern Germany. Settled on a heathland in a carr (a forest with a swampy forest floor), the Wulfs produce a long lineage of heath farmers.

It’s a war between the Catholic forces of the Habsburg Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, and various other Protestant and Catholic forces, including those of France, Sweden, and Denmark. The point of the novel is that the small rural community Wulf belongs to becomes a lawless zone, forcing the farmers to make a stand for themselves.

As the war progresses, a sort of diversity encroaches upon the farmers’ dwellings: marauders, robbers, rapists all trample upon the land. And then the soldiers come. At first, Wulf is cooperative. He borrows officers his materials and horses, but is slapped in the face when asked for compensation. And then, early on in the novel, fate strikes. Harm Wulf’s family is murdered by soldiers fight in the war.

This is the turning point for a story of prolonged revenge. Wulf decides to become the leader of a local guerrilla outfit. Using the terrain, and remnants of an old fort, 111 or more guerillas begin taking out soldiers, killing them, drowning them, and hanging them, as revenge for the disruption caused by themselves.

The book’s themes are repeated verbatim throughout: “eye for an eye”, “those who draw our people’s blood must bleed themselves”, we kill the ones who have killed one of ours. And as guerrilla warriors, they live by this principle, not of the survival of the fittest, not of might is right, as we nowadays say in right-wing circles, but of the fact that only the most ruthless men will survive.

So, in a way, the story offers a great analogy with our own time. We are living in an age of diversity where a very diverse group of rapists, murderers, robbers and gangbangers are pushed upon us, shoved in our faces. The authorities don’t care. The media don’t believe us. So if we don’t make a stand for ourselves, we might as well be wiped out.

And the book, in fact, also condemns precisely those people we call “Normies” today, those people who just sit and wait for the war to be over, starving themselves while doing nothing. And that is wrong, the book says.

Harm and his guerillas spend the next 30 years spilling a lot of blood, but they survive, they make it to the end. Because in this situation, the authorities don’t help. The church won’t believe you. The armies don’t come to your rescue. You are left to your own devices.

And when you are like that, as the book describes, then you have every right to make a stand for yourself. You are your own last line of defense, and God permits it. Because if you help yourself, God will help you. The message is that people who behave proactively have the best chances at their survival. And sometimes violent reprisals are necessary to teach violent men a lesson.

The 2015 book Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry by Colin Flaherty appears to be a banned book, though it is still available on the internet for those looking for it. Flaherty describes a wide range of black-on-white violent crime incidents reported by mainstream news that, together, tell a story.

The story it tells is that African Americans are the most violent group of all Americans, that they are responsible for the majority of violent crimes, and that their violence is intensely racially motivated while White liberal journalists, educators, and politicians do whatever they can to hide this truth of black racial violence by pretending blacks are the real victims.

Having read the book, a certain picture emerges of black street violence: Black women are the ring leaders, such as in the case of a mob of 20 black students beating up a White family of three after a black female bus driver ordered the students on the bus to do so. She waited for them to be done beating the 9-year-old child and his mom so they could get back on the bus.

As with most matriarchal races (since only White people and Japanese people are truly patriarchal), the women rule. An American counter-terrorism manual, for example, explains that when dealing with Islamic terrorists, it is best practice to take out any females in the terrorist group first—because their females are the leadership. It’s no different with black people. They, too, are led by a matriarchal leadership (think of Queen Oprah).

From Colin Flaherty, we also learn about the ridiculously paranoid black psyche and fragile black ego. Every day, I wake up to echoes of these problems in the comment sections under my social videos. What I read there are comments from black people entirely incapable of doing any introspection. Too many black people are paranoid schizos who think White people want to eat them. The scary part is: They really believe this.

Author Flaherty frequently asks about the causes for black violence, and so he introduces his audience to clinical psychologist and prison counselor Marlin Newburn, whose insights about the black psyche are simply too astonishing to ignore. I’ve decided to quote a lot of Newburn’s comments verbatim.

Newburn worked as a prison psychologist, studying and supporting violent black criminals. He is, therefore, our “frontline guy” who knows the truths that journalists and politicians love glossing over with fake stories of slavery and systemic racism:

“The comments by these [White] people in authority are blatantly ignorant and predator-enabling. Black predators know they will never be held accountable for any outrageous or violent action, and they are completely conditioned to understand that someone will stand in front of a reporter or TV camera and make excuses for them. They know they're protected, nationwide. Even the laziest observer should consider how they have no qualms about assaulting completely innocent people.

[…] They perpetuate misery by defending the indefensible such as widespread black predation and other crimes. It causes too much cognitive dissonance and confusion, and it doesn't comport with their imagined status as a great liberator and defender of their chosen imagined, downtrodden group.”

Violent blacks win street cred by acting psychopathic:

Black street predators are raised to hate any non-black, and this instruction comes from elders in the ghetto and the race-hustlers who constantly preach the continuing lie of black victimhood. These predators are completely sadistic, without a trace of empathy, and they gain greater status in their group if their assaults are particularly vicious.

[…] They believe that they have some black toxic-tribal license to attack, and the more brutal, the more ‘down with the struggle’ they are. The degree of viciousness also demonstrates just how manly (or womanly) they are. In other words, the more sadistic, the higher the social and personal power status.

It's also great street cred for them, the sacred status for assaulting the all-pervasive and imaginary white power structure, and in regard to Asians and Hispanics, those people are just ‘takin’ jobs’ from them.

[…] When assaulting or killing someone, the absence of a conscience is considered among their peers as an indicator of strength and power. Expressing joy in the process only heightens their street cred. Most all are functionally illiterate, but one lesson most all of them have learned from their elders, beginning in their earliest years, is to hate white people.

Violent blacks are infantilized:

“Black street predators are a completely infantilized population living their preferred lifestyle. A person becomes infantilized, an adult-child, if consequences for their aberrant behavior are excused, ignored, rationalized, dismissed, or defended. They know they will never be held accountable for their savagery, and thus they will never change—or grow up. They also believe that life is a party where promiscuity, drug and alcohol use, theft, and any other destructive impulsive behavior they choose to engage in is a legitimate lifestyle. These community authority figures are insuring it will continue, and reporters’ wildly convoluted reasoning is just icing on the insanity cake.

[…] These predators were merely living out their preferred lifestyle, a primary part of the black culture, as opposed to a subculture. This lifestyle is one of sadistic and primitive impulse where they believe themselves to be 10 feet tall, bulletproof, very smart, good looking, gifted, and tougher than anyone. If you’re thinking that’s the narcissism common among pre-adolescent children, ages 6 through 12 inclusive, you’d be correct. This population lives without any sense of personal responsibility or boundaries with others.

[…] The sick trait is that they have no problem publicly complaining about life conditions they have created for themselves. Maladapted adolescents do this often.

As well, they sanctify the most pathological people and conditions, i.e., “The Trayvon Martin Foundation.” [Or today’s George Floyd.] That would be like white people setting up a scholarship program in memory of John Dillinger.”

Black violence is racially motivated:

“The violence is real and based on hate. And the hate is based on race. Almost all of the black inmates I’ve dealt with over the years are raised on a diet of racial resentment and violence. But for some reason, reporters do not know it, or choose to ignore it.

[…] To people who practice this type of racial violence, all non-blacks are the enemy since they were weaned on the idea that whites/Asians/Hispanics/Martians were ‘keeping my people down’.

They may be functionally illiterate, and I have yet to meet one that wasn't, but their older family members or people in their neighborhood along with the popular culture drove that early message [of black racism] into their skulls.

[…] The people who practice this kind of racial violence—like the Knockout Game—have imaginary, social injustice tags as legitimate reasons to assault all non-blacks.

To say the black assaults on non-blacks aren’t racist is a blatant lie. Black predators are racist to the bone. Most all live the part in prison.”

White educators thought they were the solution, but made the problem worse:

“The liberal is the prototypical appeaser of bad behavior, and for decades, liberals have run public schools in America. I've seen firsthand where the most brutal school space-taker will be given scores of chances instead of permanently sending it home for parental repair. After all, the public school potentates believe school thugs are just misunderstood and should be given unending chances to destroy the learning environment. That the teachers are paying the personal price for this thug-enabling system comes not as a shock. It is predictable.”

Stockholm Syndrome: Naive White people first apologize for blacks, until they are attacked by them:

“When talking about crime victims who have been naïve or otherwise ignorant of dangerous environments, forgiveness also appears to be a knee-jerk response to not just the physical assault, but the traumatic destruction of an ideal the victim may have harbored regarding their assailants.

In the case of black mob assaults, victims often believed the supposed put-upon black race need only to be understood and seen as social victims, and a blanket acceptance of all blacks do in life is part of being a good person.

Prior to being assaulted, many of the victims who I’ve talked with over the years had harbored a sense of nobility and even adolescent invincibility since they had convinced themselves that their ‘higher value system’ exempted them from social dangers to include physical harm.

After the assault, that belief is destroyed, and something has to replace it quickly for emotional stability, hence, instant forgiveness.”

If you’d ask ordinary persons if they think unintelligent people can be heart surgeons, a surprising majority will answer in the affirmative. They’ll say intelligence has got nothing to do with being a skilled surgeon. Hard work and access to training do. But if you’d ask the same people a year later if they’d want the least intelligent surgeon in the world to perform their heart surgery, they’d exclusively answer “no”. So let’s explore this apparent mob insanity.

We can figure out why people often hold such wildly contradictory opinions. In the first case, the outcome didn’t affect them personally. Who cares if there are some unintelligent people allowed to be surgeons? As long as they work hard and do the training. That doesn’t affect me. But in the second case, all of a sudden, the heart surgeon affecting my health better be the best one I can get, because now it’s personal. I might die!

If this is how ordinary people usually reason, if not always, then how can democracy be the “best possible system”? In a democracy, people are guaranteed to vote for wildly different policies based solely on whether said policy will affect themselves or others. If migrants are dumped in lower-class neighborhoods, then why should middle-class voters care about immigration-fueled rape and crime? It doesn’t affect them, unless it means they get cheap laborers such as nannies, roofers, and gardeners.

Likewise, we hardly saw any anti-immigration riots in the country of the Netherlands until asylum centers were being opened right in the middle of middle-class neighborhoods, next to middle-class high schools and hockey clubs, such as recently in Loosdrecht. Then, the reasonably well-organized middle class instantly pushed back against the thought of having their daughters raped by blacks, North Africans, and Middle Easterners.

Previously, though, no middle-class Dutch citizen gave a hoot about the actual rape of the lower class’s children. In an act of sheer irony, the middle class people now affected by the consequences of their own vote (since the well-to-do tend to vote left-of-center), started complaining about the lack of lower-class solidarity! Why doesn’t the nation rise up together against this migrant invasion? Well, other towns and regions still aren’t affected.

And so, the backlash becomes predictable and manageable from the government’s perspective. People only riot when the value of their own home is affected, not when others’ homes are being invaded by criminal immigrants. By strategically targeting one after the other region for diversification (or rather, anti-gentrification), the total daily backlash remains small enough for police forces to crack down on. It’s the frog in a slow-boiling pot of water who doesn’t jump out.

This dynamic explains why almost all European national soccer teams are very diverse—because soccer is considered a lower-class sport meant for mass entertainment. Some national teams are nearly majority black, such as France’s men’s soccer. But the Dutch women’s field hockey team, for example, is still 100% White. And so is France’s U19 korfball team, as are most European ice hockey teams, curling teams, or weird semi-elite sports such as pole-vaulting.

Have you noticed a trend, here, though? Black athletes dominate sports that require explosive sprinting (track and field, soccer, etc.) but they are nearly absent in every other sport that requires good technique or intelligent teamplay. Never mind, that’s just an observation.

One might blame class instead, but isn’t class also based on group competence? Most middle-class European sports are nearly all-white because they source players from middle to upper-middle-class milieus, whereas soccer draws from the “favelas” of the poor and the destitute (and incompetent).

The insanity of the mob (I don’t care about what doesn’t affect me) applies to our cultural elites as well. A famous example is director Christopher Nolan who couldn’t praise Ellen Page enough for her role in The Odyssey. He called her a “he” as though the 5-foot girly munchkin were the very best choice to play an ancient Greek warrior.

It doesn’t affect Nolan and the other members of cultural and financial elites if ordinary people have to watch trans imbeciles or ugly black Helens of Troy. The cultural elites live in gated communities, and they are insulated from the antihuman trainwreck they have created.

Then what can we do about all this? If it is humanity’s general trend not to care about what does not affect them, and if it is precisely this insanity that democracy amplifies, then the solution is to do away with democracy and replace it with the leadership of a Divine Autocrat. Yes, I am saying that the American invention of involving a free people in the decision-making of the government was a mistake.

Democracy was a mistake precisely because it did not account for the consequences of mob insanity, namely that it would undermine the race and the people once thought fit enough to be ruled by democracy. The people most in favor of democracy are the ones most radically opposed to defending democracy’s boundaries. They favor globalism and open borders because it doesn’t immediately affect them. It does, however, affect democracy in the long run, and we have reached the end of this process already.

Democracy is dead because democratic people murdered it with immigration. It’s time to choose another way, one that transcends people’s carelessness and self-centeredness, by appointing a divine autocrat to rule over the West, a man who will restore order, defend our borders and bring back justice.

In the past, people would never have thought of attacking their own country, let alone burn down their people’s houses. But when states introduce such levels of diversity that entire neighborhoods become segregated, and unequal treatment benefiting immigrants becomes rampant, then the groundwork has been laid for a new kind of guerrilla warfare against globalism.

Stephen Ogilvie (44) is a hard-hearing man with learning disabilities living in north Belfast, Northern Ireland. Despite having helped out his immigrant Sudanese neighbor move into his council house, according to this local reporter, four days later, that neighbor Hadi Alodid (30) decided to severely maim Ogilvie’s head with a Stanley knife.

Among others, Alodid cut out Ogilvie’s left eye, damaged the right eye, and wounded the head, neck, and back with deep cuts as the victim lay on a public street at night with the attacker sitting on his victim’s arms to prevent the victim from defending himself.

The hero of the story is a man named Maitiu Mág Tighearnán who used a hurling stick (a traditional sport attribute) to save the victim. Alodid, the perpetrator, later received care at a local hospital where is also threatened to kill an NHS radiographer.

Then, on the evening of June 9th, riots erupted. Scenes of droves of black-clad young men were aired on national television, and the night was marked by several housing units suspected of housing immigrants going up in flames. Indeed, several immigrants in the area have announced to be “leaving” the city, or perhaps the country, citing that they feel “unwanted”.

Though the fires that broke out, including cars and a bus, appeared poorly coordinated, the fires in Belfast have shown how quickly the tides of history can change. What once seemed an immutable reality, namely that we should always tolerate more mass immigration into our midst, is now a memory gone up in flames.

A weakness has been discovered in the system that previously would never budge. Of course our societies could never sustain eternal immigration. Of course states could not keep suppressing native anxieties over what amounted to replacement immigration. Of course the whole ordeal of demographic change was going to become a case of crimes against humanity.

The Belfast shock response comes at a time when Western governments are already failing to provide housing to anyone. And now, units are catching fire that only a treasonous fire brigade would want to put out, for we are living in separate realities now. One is the reality of international corporations, and the other is of native peoples of flesh and blood who fear they are being uprooted by global profit schemes.

Of course those arriving at our shores and borders were never refugees deserving of protection. They were substitute consumers and cheap laborers brought in on demand by multinational corporations seeking to keep the economy going.

I am already tired of having to repeat the same facts, again and again, that half of migrants coming in never work, and the other half still drain state coffers because they’re net costs to society for their entire lives. We all know about the crime statistics.

In countries such as the Netherlands, it’s roughly 60% of all crime if we count first and second generation immigrants. It’s over 80% if we also count the third generation. Meaning, the White majority of such a country is only responsible for, at most, 20% of all crime.

When I did the math on the Netherlands’ official national statistics, I found out, for example, that 61% of Dutch rapists had at least one parent or grandparent born outside of the country, whereas 65% of rape victims were natives. Clearly, this indicates a foreign preference for native/White rape victims, meaning that a large share of rapes are also race-hate crimes committed by darker-skinned men against pale-skinned women.

But this suffices, for what the events in Northern Ireland have shown the world is that it will be very easy for small bands of black-clad men to wage a new style of guerrilla warfare against globalism.

In the past, we would never set fire to our own houses to fight the government, but now that they’re no longer our own houses ... who will put the fires out? The European man’s logic goes, “If we can’t live here, no one will.” Or as someone added, “We can rebuild, they can’t.”

First, the state is going to respond with greater repression, arguing it’s your access to the news or social media that’s the real problem, not the beheadings of kind disabled people. Not the shootings of the elderly. Not the rapes of so many girls.

There are obvious reasons why the progressive liberals in charge don’t like doing the research, and don’t like mentioning the facts. They are implicated in crimes against humanity, and reading the facts out loud can be used a in court case against progressive leadership.

Liberals will to try saving their face by banning people from using the internet. But one thing these bureaucrats will never do, and that is to admit that they were wrong, that mass immigration and multiculturalism were grave mistakes, and that the age of globalism is already over.

In fact, globalism ended almost 20 years ago. We are the post-globalist generation, and we are going to demand a return to the values of people and place, of honor and dignity.

Justice is coming, and the traitors will kneel before our God.

In 1930, Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung wrote an article titled, Your Negroid and Indian Behavior, in which he analyzed how minorities had influenced the White American psyche. Upon his first trip to the USA in 1909, Jung mistook the White workers leaving Buffalo factories for mixed-race men contaminated with Amerindian blood. “But don’t you see their faces? They are more Indian than European.”

“I was once the guest of a stiff and solemn New England family whose respectability was almost terrifying … but there were Negro servants waiting on the table, and they made me feel as though I were eating lunch in a circus. … I found myself cautiously scrutinizing the dishes, looking for imprints of those black fingers.

Read more

Right on the tracks of another rape case in Britain, in which three boys were sentenced to “rehabilitation” but no prison time after raping two girls on separate occasions, yet another lenient sentencing has shocked the world. Sane people are left wondering why we don’t jail youth gang rapists.

In 2024, a 16-year-old boy lured his 14-year-old Belgian girlfriend to a forest near the town of Kortrijk, along the E17 highway. There, under threats, he raped the girl before his friends’ eyes, after which he invited them to do the same. The gang rapes were recorded and spread on Snapchat. The girl was gang raped twice more on different days.

If you were guessing that the rapists are Africans doing an African-style gang rape, you were right. The boyfriend was a Somali kid and his friends were mostly North African types, ages 11 to 16.

Their convictions in 2026 amount to 30 hours of community service for the participants of the gang rapes, and the ring leader, the Somali boy, was released on condition that he would follow a rehabilitation program “to learn about sexuality and relationships”.

(This made me chuckle cynically.)

In response, a Dutch newspaper drummed up a juvenile judge and a cultural anthropologist to justify the lenient sentencing, or rather, to explain to normie citizens why this is the right thing to do. In that article, judge Bart Tromp argues that “porn and social media” are the reason that youths turn to gang raping other children. Anthropologist Paul Mutsaers warns against “the moral underbelly”. In other words, we should leave the matter to the experts.

But the experts are so obviously wrong. The lenient sentencing for raping youths stems from a dark liberal belief that such boys “don’t know rape is wrong” because they “haven’t learned to respect women yet”.

This belief ignores that these boys are, with great certainty, cognitively impaired. Indeed, in the British case I mentioned, two of the three boys (who were Irish Travelers) were respectively retarded (an IQ below 70) and cognitively diminished (an IQ below 85).

You can’t teach such boys to treat women with greater respect. At such low IQ levels, people aren’t capable of recognizing another human being as a sovereign individual. This isn’t even because of their culture, but because of their genetics. They are genetically retarded people who rape because they see women’s bodies as sources of gratification. You cannot rehabilitate such men. Only old age will one day rob them of their sex drives, and only extreme authoritarianism can keep such men in line.

This is, in fact, what their nations of origins practice: extreme religious theocracy and death penalties for proven rape. Western nations increasingly confronted with cognitively impaired imbeciles from the Third World have no way of dealing with the blatant disregard of human integrity by such men. Our silk gloves were never designed to handle the sort of wild men you read about in ancient Mesopotamian stories.

However, the truth is out there. One psychologist, Robert Kegan, calls the personality of such impaired rapists the “second order personality type”, i.e., the Imperial Mind or Self-Sovereign stage:

“Relationships are transactional. Stage 2 individuals view people as a means to get their own needs met, as opposed to a shared internal experience (how we feel about each other). They care about how others perceive them, but only because those perceptions may have concrete consequences for them. For example, when Stage 2 friends do not lie to each other, it is because of a fear of the consequences or retaliation, not because they value honesty and transparency in a relationship.” [source]

When you were reading that quoted paragraph, were you thinking about Black men? Or perhaps certain other migrant groups? And surely, you were thinking of retarded Whites from the trailer park.

This is what we are dealing with. We are not dealing with a sudden flush of White Western youths who lost their ability to respect women because of porn or social media. No, we are dealing with demographic changes that have migrated in millions of boys and men whose cognitive abilities are below the requirement to be able to respect women.

You cannot teach them otherwise.

We are dealing with a generation of foreign-born men of the second order personality type who cannot and will not respect women, ever. The only sensible solutions to keep such men from raping are 1) either to impose hard theocracy on these men with severe punishments (death for rape), or 2) to remigrate them back to their natural habitats.

Ignoring this reality, however, points to an equally great mental deficit among the White administrator class of our societies. They, too, need therapy, namely to cure themselves of cultural relativism. The judges and anthropologists of the West need to learn about racial cognitive differences, and about how large scale mass immigration changes the outcomes perceived in society.

Refusing to accept these aforementioned realities, judges should be removed from their jobs, and politicians should be jailed for their ignorance.

University of Wisconsin demographer Yi Fuxian has been arguing for decades (mostly on Project Syndicate) that China’s present 1.4 billion population has been overcounted by some 100-130 million people. Most of these phantom citizens were ‘born’ after 1990. Despite these claims, China’s official statistics office has not felt the need to adjust the tally downward. But are there valid reasons to start doubting the total human population size of 8.3 billion (2026)?

Besides Yi Fuxian, there are other, heavily online demographers claiming China’s population is really under 1 billion or even under 500 million. I classify these claims as Chinese propaganda, namely meant to discredit the very idea of an overcounted Chinese population. Videos claiming China’s countryside is “empty” ignore that, indeed, the majority of China’s population has always lived in the nations’ Eastern basin, since the Western parts of the nation are extremely mountainous or arid.

China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) registered the official 2026 tally at 1.405 billion people, down just 3.39 million from last year, due to deaths exceeding births. However, according to Yu Fuxian, local Chinese authorities have had reasons to overstate births in their regions, namely to attract government subsidies, or to avoid penalties. Local administrators are believed to have falsified school enrollment statistics, for example.

Apart from internal and regional reasons to inflate the population size, there may be international or geopolitical reasons why China wouldn’t want to adjust its population down to 1.3 or 1.27 billion people (as per Fuxian’s calculations). What comes to mind is China’s competition with India as the world’s most populous nation. China’s position as the world’s largest population wins it a certain authority—the weightiness of the world’s Middle Kingdom—along with a badge of economic and political competence.

Managing a nation with a population four to five times the size of the US is no small feat. Geopolitically speaking, China may also have many reasons to “throw its weight around” on the international stage. Having the world’s largest population can help intimidate one’s enemies militarily. The message is: “You Americans may have big rockets, but we’ve got half a billion expendable soldiers ready for a ground war.”

Lastly, boasting the world’s largest consumer market may also attract billions of USD$ in Wall Street investments to China, thus propping up its economy and its positions as rivaling economic superpower.

Reasons to Misrepresent the Global Population

Nations such as China, as we can see, may have various reasons to misrepresent their true population sizes. Whether overcounting to attract investments and subsidies, or undercounting, the crux is that physical population headcounts are extremely costly and difficult to organize. Most populations’ headcounts rely on proper birth and death registrations by local offices. That’s where things might easily go wrong.

For starters, I wouldn’t want to suggest that this sort of thing—miscounting the population—doesn’t happen in Western nations. I would suggest it also happens in modern nations. Below is an overview of reasons why either developed or developing nations might want to overstate, or sometimes deliberately undercount, their true populations sizes:

• Exaggerations of the regional or local population due to central government division of funds (e.g., subsidies, investments), for example by enrolling non-existent school pupils or undercounting natural deaths to hide a shrinking population. (Think of the Somali daycare scam in the US State of Minnesota.)

• International aid and loans: Larger reported populations can attract more financial assistance, even from the World Bank, other humanitarian aid, or concessional loans from UN agencies, bilateral donors, as aid is often scaled to population needs.

• Reparations for climate change, slavery, or colonialism: Larger populations can claim a larger stake from the reparations pie. Besides inflating the number of alleged victims, such reparations will also incentivize “crying wolf harder”, i.e., inflating crimes or even inventing mass genocides that never happened.

• Political/electoral power: Inflated figures can justify more seats in parliament, more representatives, or greater influence in regional blocs. Think of the US electoral college if it were changed for states be proportional to their relative share of the national population.

• National prestige: Governments may inflate numbers to project strength or hide demographic decline.

• Lower per-capita burdens: Underreporting can make per-capita GDP/income appear higher (improving global rankings), reduce reported poverty rates, or lower obligations under international agreements (e.g., climate targets scaled to population).

• Hide demographic issues: Countries facing rapid aging or low fertility (e.g., some claims about China inflating figures to mask faster-than-admitted decline) might underreport to avoid signaling weakness.

• Security/military: Smaller reported populations can downplay vulnerability or resource strains.

There may be many other reason, but when we add them all up, what is more likely, a global overcount or a global undercount? I suggest the overall incentive to misrepresent population headcounts skews the total upward, not downward, namely to project power and lay claim to divisions of funds and resources.

Greek philosopher Plato wrote that the soul had three parts, the rational, the spirited, and the appetitive. In his Republic, he also wrote that men should share their wives, that all sex should be had in public, and that children should be raised in communes without knowing who their real parents were.

Hippies of the 1960s implemented Plato’s ideas while rejecting Plato’s hard authoritarianism. But before we dismiss Plato as an idiot, we should note that Plato never meant anything he said or wrote to be serious or true. He was only doing hypothetical experiments in his head to see if there was something else that could be learned, for example, about the nature of human beings. It is the people who took Plato’s writings at face value who are the idiots.

Plato never observed a soul and could, therefore, never have determined its parts. This is why Western philosophy shouldn’t be a subject taught to random people, as though philosophy were a development of truths and facts. Philosophy’s study and teaching should be reserved to the cognitive and verbal elite who, moreover, possess the faculty of critical self-reflection. You need to be able to dismiss a lot as nonsense or see it as hypothetical conjecture, not as a “real”.

Have you noticed how people, especially on the progressive side of the political spectrum, are prisoners of words? That’s why leftist governments want to censor you thought. Scary words make these people feel scared. Angry words make them shrink. They confused words in their head for deeds in reality. It’s why liberal judges will convict man who “said” he was going to rape a woman (but didn’t), while the same judges will free another man who did rape a woman but “said” he didn’t know it was wrong to rape.

When we start confusing words for realities, we become idiots. Indeed, our judiciary, political bureaucracy, and even newspaper offices are staffed with idiots. But through a process of learning, imagining, and reflecting, we can arrive at truer insights. Anything learned by rote without question belongs to the realm of idiocy. Taking words for literal truths is a flaw of character. You’re supposed to reflect on words to find out what they actually achieved in terms of action in the real world.

Modern scientists, for example, say they want to study the “real” world that they say exists independently from human observers, by removing the observer. And so, they build machines, apparatuses, and measurement devices to “objectively” measure that a certain value is such and such. Then, they trust the “data” because it “says so”. But have they truly removed the human observer from said observation? No! The machine—after all—was created by these men. The machine, therefore, is an extension still of a human observer and, therefore, the observation is still subject to human interference.

I can poke a fish with my finger or I can poke it with a stick. I’m still involved either way. I could also design a machine that pokes sticks at fish. This doesn’t mean I have removed myself as an interfering observer at all. I have merely visually separated myself from the act through the use of a machine (that I made), but my intentions, my thoughts, my reasoning all still affect the outcome in the exact same manner as before. I have not really removed myself as an observer. Yet, scientists are convinced that by saying the magic words, “we’ve removed the human observer from the experiment”, they have achieved it really.

At present, there is no science whatsoever that has ever measured or known a thing without this subjective human factor mingling with the results. A thing, no thing, can be known without human observation. Even if we built a robot to help build us a scientific measuring device, the robot will still have been built by humans, or by other robots built by humans, or by machines built my humans that build robots.

Though we can always further increase the distance between ourselves and an observation—toward infinity—we can never sever this link between us and the outside world. Rather than fight this insight, the intelligent person embraces it: “All observation known to man is subjectively human observation.” This is the sort of truth Plato might have been looking for, for it supersedes mere words and zones in on the crux of the problem.

Accepting this forces us to explore related insights, such as the meaning of this distantly ‘tethered’ reality, a reality, unlike an umbilical cord, that can never be severed from humanity. Now, we are starting to think intelligently.

Not being an idiot has something to do with exploring, discovering, recognizing, embracing, and understanding either limitations or their absence. We can, for example, do a re-read of ancient Greek philosophy from the early Milesians through the Socratics and conclude that most of what these men had ever said or done was largely made up from behind their writing desks. Did Socrates even exist? We have a Roman copy of a Greek statue pertaining to be Socrates, but we don’t have the Greek original. (It could be that the figure Socrates was a fantasy, a figment of Plato’s. Which, however, doesn’t affect the quality of the thoughts presented as those of Socrates.)

Ordinary people cannot think very well. For example, when I suggested that perhaps several phantom centuries had been inserted into the Western timeline to put Otto III’s coronation in the year 1000 AD (see Heribert Illig) for the sake of unifying Europe under Christianity against Islam that rose during the 7th, this fact alone suggests, indeed, that Europeans didn’t wait for 300 years to counter Islam as a unified continent but that they must have done so much sooner.

However, the insertion of three fake centuries does not, in any way, affect real events that occurred during those “years”, even when we now remove the phantom centuries again and place ourselves in the year 1729. The Norse Vikings still went to Iceland, for example, and the Sutton Hoo helmet was still found. All that’s changed are the years these events are attributed to on a calendar that was always fictionally human to begin with. My point is that words (and calendars and human bookkeeping) are descriptive of reality, but not prescriptive. Words don’t rule the world, actions and events do.

Mind you, the confusion between actions and words arises only in feminine societies such as our modern world today. In more masculine ages, such as the Bronze Age, people were handily illiterate and didn’t keep records, and so there was no confusion about reality. Indeed, there are stories of peoples fleeing into the mountains who then, over time, lose their ability to read and write again. This act frees the newly illiterate people from the valley bureaucracies below. (Note that all great civilizations and empires were valley cultures, since mountainous regions are always too expensive to police.)

The illiterate but free men forget their texts but they don’t forget their history. The history becomes oral, restoring, in a way, the power of words to the speaker instead of to the bookkeeping bureaucrat and his legal texts. Now you know what killed magic: government bureaucracy killed the power of the magician’s words by documenting magic spells and thereby muting their potency.

Certain steps in the development of logical thought apparently took centuries if not millennia to be written down, either because people had no practical use for said advances, or because humanity by and large produces mostly very dim individuals who can’t do it.

For this is points to another great revelation: why do seemingly low-verbal humans coexist with high-verbal humans? And why do lawmakers reading from dusty old legalese texts wield the greatest apparent power? It’s because words rule people, but only people already subjected to the power of words—reasonably feminine people. For unlike men, women don’t test whether words they hear are physically possible. Intelligent manly men, it seems, are able to emulate the words they hear, as a video replay, to see if they make sense. But feminine women take the literal for the real, or at least pretend to do so.

Regardless, the logicians have fallen into the same trap that material scientists have fallen into. There is no limit to the number of logical insights one can have, as there is no limit to the number of observations a scientist can have. This brings us hidden limitations: If there is no limit to the number of insights or observations one can have, then there isn’t going to be a unifying Theory of Everything either. Every thought unthought beholds the power to undo the latest theories. And such a thing has already happened many times over.

This happened, for example, when we moved from a Euclidean understanding of space to a Newtonian one and then an Einsteinian one. The underlying ‘real’ space never changed, insofar there is a real space, and humanity’s limited grasping of the physical world only slightly improved in the process. I must remind the reader that our ancestors living before Giordano Bruno and Copernicus all though that “space” outside of Earth was the realm where our souls gathered after death. Only under the influence of Western materialist philosophy did European men begin to imagine space as a physical place. It was not until fairly recent that the concept of “outer space” became popularized in science fiction stories.

Are we, perhaps, living under the spell of such stories? Are we imagining trips to the moon that never really happened?

What is even the purpose of a supposed Theory of Everything? Why would anyone care to find it at all? Why do scientists claim that they keep getting closer to discovering this theory of everything? Or more precisely: Why should anyone care to know a definite system that can explain everything?

The desire to know everything and for there to be a definite thing to know informs us of something about human nature, namely of our innate limitedness. We show an innate desire for closure or resolution, a desire for putting an end to wants and needs, so that we may liberate ourselves from our chronic economic struggles. We just want to live the easy life. Though life already offers us such a thing, namely in death.

The desire for a theory of everything is no different from a desire for heaven, which is no different from a desire for eternal rest after death. We believe in these things because, after some time, after having lived life for several decades, we grow weary, tired, of having to do so many things over and over again. The things we once enjoyed doing first become routine, then a bore, and then a nuisance.

Much of the faith we once held in the future has proven futile, juvenile, impossible, or impractical. We were promised old age and security (by our capitalist employers), but the older we got, the more the such promises began to show clearly that it was all a scam.

Humanity thrives on idiots doing the work for others who exploit them. The true power structures of the world are indeed linguistic, for such a large portion of humans either believe what was said or, lacking counter-arguments, will unthinkingly pretend to go along with it.

To stop being an idiot, one must learn to think, and learning to think means to practice one’s imaginative faculties.

This is the story of how I was targeted by Dutch secret services, arrested, and wrongfully thrown in pre-trial detention for 13 days, only to be acquitted of sedition (carrying 5 years in prison). Having seen the police dossiers and court documents, I can now explain why it happened.

In late September 2024, I was resting in my parked car in the Netherlands near a sports field when 2 police officers started banging on my windows. They had traced me by triangulating my cell phone signals. They found my car because they already knew what license plate number, make, and model they were looking for: a silver 2011 BMW 1-series.

Moreover, one of these police officers had come down from The Hague. He wasn’t a local policeman. He was on a special mission to find me in the south of the Netherlands, to where I had returned after spending time in Budapest, Hungary.

Arrest without Cause

Earlier that evening, these officers had posed as buyers for my online marketplace sale, but they had failed to show up, so I cancelled on them. I drove away from the meeting point. Their plan had been to keep me waiting. The police were on their way for a surprise arrest!

I had evaded them, unbeknownst, but now they had found me again. I had to show the officers my ID, but they already knew who I was. They carried a printed-out photo of me with them for comparison, after which they claimed I was indeed the man on their wanted list, and they had spotted me. What?

They couldn’t tell me why, except that I had been a wanted man since early 2024. They ordered me to enter their police car. Since I didn’t resist arrest, I wasn’t cuffed. After being processed at the police station, handing over my cell phone, car keys, and wallet, I was put in a solitary holding cell.

Still, no one could tell me why I was being jailed. I vowed, then and there, that this was going to have severe consequences. I told the highest ranking officer present that you can’t just arrest a man for no reason. Oh, they also forgot to hand me the piece of paper explaining my rights to me—I got it three days later, just before meeting with the examining magistrate in The Hague.

Interrogations

But first, I was to be interrogated by two junior public prosecutors. A state-appointed lawyer supported me, since I couldn’t afford one.

One of the prosecutors, the male, sat there wearing his Rammstein t-shirt. This was shortly after Rammstein’s frontman had been accused of rape. Was he trying to relate to me? I hate heavy metal. The other prosecutor, an older female, came across as mentally unstable.

The purpose of their interrogations was solely to try to establish that I was indeed the person who had written a certain online post. The next day, more interrogations ensued. This time, they wanted to establish whether I was the author of a certain TikTok video.

On the third day, I was transported to The Hague by these same interrogators, who continued their interrogation in the car with me. I was handcuffed for an hour-long trip to our political capital. As we entered that city, we crossed under a bridge on a busy street that felt like passing through the gates of hell.

It was in the car that the male prosecutor, riding next to me, wanted to know about what I thought of Russia? “Russia?” I thought. I felt the conversation was getting random. I told him I thought Russia was a nation marked by poverty, and that I wouldn’t know, since I’d never been there, and had no interest in the country. After all, I thought Putin ideologue Dugin was an anti-White idiot. He is.

Aware that I was being recorded in the car (although they hadn’t told me), I rambled about all and nothing, basic chit chat, and told the prosecutor that I had heard of many people speaking Russian in Budapest ... because the older people learned it in high school before the fall of the Soviet Union.

I grew tired of the prosecutor’s weird talk, and at one point, I dismissively smiled without saying anything more. That led to the prosecutor’s violent verbal outburst, “What are you laughing at??” I was laughing at his low-IQ stupidity and his weird choice of topics.

After that, they dropped talking to me about Russia. I hadn’t yet figured out why they would bring up Russia in a conversation with me. A faint suspicion lingered on in my mind. Did they think I was with the Russians?

Meanwhile, my laptop had been retrieved from my still parked car, and my cell phone was to be examined. If I didn’t give up my passwords, they said my devices would be returned to me “in pieces”. This turned out to be an empty threat. I never gave up my passwords, but they eventually returned me my devices (after the court case) with just the SIM card removed and the cameras taped shut. They were fine.

‘Convicted’ by the Examining Magistrate

I arrived at another holding cell, part of The Hague’s courthouse. I met with my lawyer who had now seen the police dossier for the first time. It included wild statements by my brother (who still hates me because I was the first-born and I got a skateboard before he did).

The examining magistrate, to my surprise, effectively convicted me on the spot. She ordered me back to prison for pre-trial detention, with my court date set 10 days later. I was lucky, because such pre-trial detention could easily be extended indefinitely for ongoing investigations.

To motivate her semiofficial conviction of me, the examining magistrate said she had read personal emails that I had sent to my mom 5 years earlier, in which I had written that I had “become very powerful”. I was taken aback by this breach of privacy, but before I could protest, the magistrate ordered me to keep my mouth shut.

What the magistrate didn’t care to learn was this: I had meant that I had become psychologically powerful. I had overcome the consequences of severe emotional neglect as a child. I had overcome selective mutism, my inability to speak in public. I had defeated my life-long depression and decades of recurring suicidal ideation. I had sent my mom a few angry emails about her lack of emotional support for me when I was young. She had been quite a ruthless mother with little to no affection to give.

The examining magistrate, however, took my words as evidence that I was power-hungry. And now I understand why: because there was no case against me. They still had to make one up.

Read more about my cell mate, the prison Chad >

Why I Was Targeted

I was arrested without clear cause because they were still looking for a cause. Today, with 20/20 hindsight vision, and having seen the dossiers and documents, I was able to piece this puzzle together. Officially, I was arrested for two counts:

1) for posting a single reply-tweet on X in November 2022, which was a rhetorical question with a “?” question mark. I had asked about a Green Party politician’s plan to destroy half of Dutch livestock. The reply had not been directed at this politician, but at the podcast account I was replying to, though the politician’s @ handle had been included automatically by X (then Twitter) as part of the conversation thread. My rhetorical question(!) implied that I wanted this politician to stop killing our farm animals. I was, however, accused of threatening and/or planning to murder this politician, carrying a minimum 1 year jail sentence.

And 2), for posting a TikTok video in February 2024, in response to a national survey that said 20% of Dutch people favored overthrowing the state. In that video, I discussed a list of 10 hypothetical demands that the people might rally for, such as offering native White women free housing, or arresting the politicians who pushed for the COVID-era restrictions. This video was branded “a call for violence”, i.e., I was accused of sedition, a crime carrying up to 5 years in prison.

In hindsight, I now know that these counts were pretexts for a conviction, not causes for the arrest. I was being held for other reasons.

The Secret Service’s Hidden Hand

Around the time of Convid, I had started posting videos to TikTok. Since 2019, I had started recording speeches for YouTube. I was trying to become influential like Vertigo Politix, but YouTube geofenced my account and restricted views to barely 80-100 per video. Unable to break out of this shadow ban, I began posting clips to TikTok.

On TikTok, my videos finally found their audience. I started going viral regularly, racking up views up to half a million per video. My activities expanded when I started discussing geopolitical events unfolding around the world. The war with Russia in Ukraine started and I began commenting on it.

Very early on, for example, I warned that White men were going to be sacrificed in the meat grinder, and that Zelenskiy was going to flood Ukraine with African immigrants to replace the men lost. (Fast-forward to 2026: We know that this is exactly what happened.) As so often, my geopolitical analyses turned out to be right. I was often correctly predicting actual policy and how it was going to unfold.

I started talking more broadly about what was going on in the world, such as in Africa. I spoke about how France still controls many a West-African nation under its French financial shadow empire. I spoke about how Europe was planning to fuse with Africa, and how the EU intended to absorb even Central-Asian nations.

And that’s how Dutch and international secret services started taking an interest in me. Not because most of what I said was wrong, but because too much of what I said was right.

You see, I sometimes spoke against the Western anti-Russian narratives. I pointed out that Bucha’s massacre had been committed by Ukraine, not Russia. Or that the “kidnappings” of Ukrainian children by Putin were really relocations of Russian-speaking children, i.e., ordinary refugees. Or that many a Ukrainian refugee that initially arrived at Germany’s borders turned out to be a black African exchange student, not a Ukrainian woman and child.

A Former Intelligence Officer

It was a foundation called Justice for Prosperity, founded in 2020 by a former Dutch secret service employee, Jelle Postma, that had flagged me. This foundation focuses on finding and tracing the sources of online threats. I had been declared a threat because of the popularity of my videos, and because they thought I was getting paid by the Russians.

Indeed, with hindsight clarity, I recognize the “feds” repeatedly commenting during my many TikTok livestreams, asking me whether I had ever been approached by Russians, or whether I had ever taken money from Russians. Or they would accuse me of having done so. All the while, these feds were posting swastikas and pushing me to talk about Hitler, which I didn’t, since I favored Von Bismarck.

These feds were employees of the Dutch secret service, the AIVD, namely of their ‘social media monitoring’ branches such as the Justice for Prosperity foundation, which acts as an intelligence front. It carries the same style and tone of Bellingcat, a NATO front. JfP was founded right at the start of the COVID era to crack down on anti-Western or pro-Russian sentiment.

When I say, “anti-Western or pro-Russian sentiment”, this includes everyone who doesn’t think children can change their birth sex, or anyone who opposes gay marriage, COVID jabs, polyamory, trans drag, or mass immigration. For, apparently, these are “Western values” now. They’re not, but if you disagree, you become an intelligence target.

I became a target for further investigation. By June 2023, it was decided, as per police dossiers, that I needed to be taken out. That’s when the police sent a request to Twitter/X to find out my IP addresses and location data. (X complied without hesitation.)

The secret services then forwarded my case to the regular authorities with the “request to prosecute”. I was ordered to be arrested, so that my phones and computers could be investigated, hoping to find links with Russian propagandists.

Problem is, my phone and laptop uncovered ... absolutely nothing.

Here I was, calling myself The Great Johannes, speaking about complex geopolitical matters in viral TikTok videos, because I had started studying geopolitics in my spare time by reading hundreds of books on the topic.

When it became clear to the magistrates that I hadn’t actually needed a Russian prompter to help write my words, they instantly dropped the Russia angle. Because there was none.

Outcome

The court case was an exercise in defamation. Since there was no case, they had to make me appear guilty in other ways.

The public prosecutor exaggerated and misrepresented my words, often by omission. He claimed, for example, that I wanted to throw brown people out of their houses. He didn’t say that I had said I wanted to give those houses to native women who can’t afford them, and that the “brown people” (not my words!) were criminal asylum seekers.

At one point, my lawyer surprised everyone in the courtroom. He had spoken to my mom (who was present), and she had testified that when I was a teenager, I had taken an IQ test at the school psychologist’s request. He ascertained before the judge that, according to my mom, I had scored an IQ of over 150.

I was acquitted of sedition, but since I had already spent 13 days in pre-trial detention, I was convicted of those 13 days for “insulting and/or threatening a politician”. Of course!

But I was innocent. I am an innocent man who had become the victim of a low-IQ intelligence operation that mistakenly assumed I wasn’t capable of formulating my own words. They suspected “the Russians” had been feeding me my lines, even paying me to perform them, like a puppet on a string.

In reality, I had become a threat to the intelligence community simply because of my ... intelligence.

In my country the Netherlands, children as young as 12 years old are allowed to apply for euthanasia with their parents’ consent. And 16 and 17-year-olds can have themselves euthanized without their parents being legally able to stop the process.

But a recent review by 19 Dutch psychiatrists in their February 2026 essay1 shows that autistic women were the most likely demographic to be euthanized in the Netherlands in the cohort under age 30.

Indeed, 74% of this group of euthanized patients under 30 was female, and 75% was autistic. So, on average, we can say that euthanasia for young people in the Netherlands targets autistic women. The 19 psychiatrists argue, however, that this practice needs to be banned for people under age 25.

Now, some of you will say that this is a private matter and the people seeking to end their lives should not be stopped. To those I say the following:

After one famous case of euthanasia of a 17-year-old girl who was depressed because she had been raped, 14 psychiatrists wrote a letter of complaint to the Dutch public protector in April 2024 saying that the girl was not competent to make the decision and that the euthanasia should not have happened.2

The public prosecutor however failed to prosecute the euthanasia doctor, saying no rules had been broken. Except, of course, the common sense rule to offer troubled young people alternative help instead of killing them.

In an American newspaper article by The Atlantic from March 2026, the mother of the girl stated that she trusted the euthanasia doctor’s assessment that death was the only option available to end the girl’s suffering.

This was an obvious lie. Wouldn’t a change of environment also have cured the girl?

Are we, as a society, manipulating young people who already feel like a burden, telling them that the only solution is for them to die? What kind of a society does that to its own children?

The good news is that the majority of Dutch psychiatrists refuse to euthanize such young people. Sadly, there are also some doctors who will put teenagers to death for a depression.

On top of this, the state of the Netherlands may have an ulterior motive, namely: the country also allows organ donation after euthanasia. The doctor who killed the 17 year old girl mentioned happens to be the most vocal supporter of organ donation after euthanasia.

I believe the state of the Netherlands is guilty of committing crimes against humanity, and I will keep speaking about this matter until the state has been convicted.

Update

Within 24 hours after my video about euthanasia for young autistic women, two women informed me that they were indeed told to "get euthanized", at ages 17 and 18.

I am preparing to send a case to the United Nations Human Rights Council, for I can prove with facts that the state of the Netherlands is committing crimes against humanity by *actively targeting autistic young people for euthanasia*, and by refusing them alternative care.

I believe the motive may be *accessing and selling young people's organs*, since organ donation after euthanasia has been allowed in the Netherlands since 2012, including for underage people.

You see, though tons of old people die each day, their old organs aren’t useful. To make organ transplants useful, they need to be from young people. But young people generally don’t die very often. And so, there is a high-priced market demand for youthful healthy organs.

This is why you are reading stories about “mentally ill teenagers” being euthanized. Euthanasia of young people is the way to harvest healthy organs for transplants. There is now a perverse incentive to tell depressed young people “they should try euthanasia”.

Read more

This is Noelia from Spain. She was murdered by the Spanish state on March 26th, 2026. Though her personal friends weren’t allowed to attend the final moments of her life, medical staff leaked the photo to global media outlets. The message is: The state can and will kill you if you are deemed inconvenient.

Noelia was gang raped while in custody of the state after bouts of depression due to earlier childhood trauma.

The problem with these pictures is that she wasn't dead yet. Moments after this obscene picture was taken, the 25-year-old Noelia was whisked away into an operating room where her still beating heart was removed for an organ donor, along with her liver kidneys, lungs, and every other useful part.

She totaled a resale value of over 2 million euros. Noelia didn't die of 'euthanasia'. She died after being harvested alive.

Noelia’s case resembles that of Milou (17) from the Netherlands, the girl who was euthanized in 2023. Like Noelia, Milou was the victim of rape while in the custody of the state. Rape at ages 13 and 16, her parents ultimately went looking for a doctor to put the daughter to death. Having initially been denied, they found one doctor willing to home in for the kill: Menno Oosterhoff.

If you have any doubts whether euthanizing young people like Noelia or Milou is about harvesting their organs, there’s Dutch doctor Menno Oosterhoff who killed Milou (17) (and many other young women). He has admitted publicly to doing organ donations after euthanasia. The practice is legal in Belgium and the Netherlands.

This is the trauma > euthanasia > organ donor pipeline, and it targets young women. It’s real.

“Oosterhoff has stated he has been involved multiple times in euthanasia followed by organ donation.”

Organ donation after euthanasia is satanically called “ODE”. The death doctors anesthetize the “patient” at home, then transfer them to a hospital (while still alive) to rip their heart and lungs, liver and kidneys out. They pause your heart to create “circulatory death” but keep the body alive & oxygenized long enough to harvest your organs. Otherwise your organs go to waste.

I.e., none of the patients who have had their organs harvested were braindead. What is called circulator death is not brain death. The patients still lingering in a deep sleep while their chests are sawed open to rip out their internals. The so-called euthanasia “medicine” administered is really the preservative, i.e., the drug that will help preserve your organs during the harvest.

Menno Oosterhoff and anyone involved deserve the death penalty for what they’ve done. This is real. This is Satan at work on your children.

I can't believe we're killing women for depression. It's giving me conscientious objections. I cannot go on living as an ordinary citizen. I feel compelled to live in opposition to the state that allows this. We are at war with Satanists who have come to harvest children’s organs.

“The Satanists must die. They deserve the death penalty via an extremely painful and unsedated public execution.”

A user commented that “China has been doing organ harvesting, without the euthanasia pretence, for a while. Western countries have been increasing the practice, with the pretence.” Indeed, the book Killed to Order by Jan Jekielek goes into detail about the Chinese method, but neglects to inform Western audiences that we use the pretext of “teen euthanasia” to harvest hard-to-acquire youthful organs.

We, in Europe, of course, have heard plenty of stories of young male hikers mysteriously disappearing, only for their body to be found again later without their organs. The trauma-to-euthanasia pipeline, however, is the newer, more orchestrated method of harvesting young people’s organs. By denying them the love and care they would have needed in order to heal, and instead green-lighting the death job.

The key to euthanasia for things like depression is that the people being euthanatised are physically healthy. This has value, at least to those depraved murderers seeking to acquire organs. The organs inside a 25-year-old body have a price, namely anywhere between 2 to 8 million USD$.

This is the sign to definitively defeat and completely eradicate leftism. Leftism is a global crime syndicate pushing degeneracy for the masses, so that rich old feminist women can receive young women’s heart transplants.

We are at war with the darkest evil to have ever shown its face in human history. We are at war with the Devil herself.

Israel may be driving Turkey to war with Europe. Turkey’s leader Erdogan has publicly condemned Israeli attacks on Gaza, and more recent attacks on Yemen and Lebanon that happened leading up to the war on Iran.

Thus, Turkey, officially a NATO member, is deviating from the US-Israeli line of interests. This is understandable since Israeli officials have recently expressed threats that Turkey is ‘next’ if Iran falls.

But with Turkey in NATO, the USA cannot support Israeli threats against Turkey, unless the USA exits NATO in order to turn against a NATO country.

Erdogan was heard implicitly calling out a certain regional supremacism, calling it a ‘network’ that has seized power (such as over the USA and EU nations, and regional Arab states).

But Turkey is no European ally either. Turkey has, at a times, disrespected European sovereignty by using mass migration as a weapon and a threat against neighboring EU nations, such as during the Syrian crisis.

Keeping Turkey in NATO was always meant to keep Turkey away from Russia. Now, if Israel is thinking of attacking Turkey next, Turkey will be forced to side with Russia. The US and Israel may be eying Turkey’s access to the Black Sea as part of their Greater Alexandrian Empire.

A Turkey allied with Russia will cause upheaval in Europe, since the EU has absorbed at least 8 million Turkish people since the 1960s, the majority of whom are living in Germany. Their number is likely much higher due to Europe’s frequently (or deliberately) lacking statistics on ethnicity.

German critic Thilo Sarrazin once wrote the book about Germany abolishing itself, a book which was never translated into English, in which he warned that Turkey wouldn’t need to put boots on the ground to conquer Germany. The Turkish immigrant men already occupying Berlin today would only have put on their military fatigues and declare victory.

I have always called the large Turkish-Muslim presence in Europe the new “Trojan Horse” or the “Turkish Camel”. A Turkey allied with Russia will allow both countries to support each other’s conquests of Eastern Europe, for historical and geopolitical reasons, thus to restore some of the old Ottoman and Russian Empires, for example by seizing Greece and Bulgaria for Turkey, or by seizing Ukraine and Poland for Russia.

Only a powerful German army would be able to stop these invasions, however, no one in Germany presently cares to wage such a war.

And that is why I know for sure that the USA and Israel are willing to throw Europe under the bus in order to achieve their own Middle Eastern goals, which include the capturing and controlling the new Silk Road area running from Greece to China, also called the New Alexandrian Empire including Iran.

In this scenario, European men will have to acquire guerrilla warfare skills and retreat into the woods to defend our Christian enclaves. I will start making a series of videos exploring guerrilla warfare.

At the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest—also called the Varian Disaster after General Varus’s suicide during the battle—Germanic warriors carrying wooden spears and leather helmets slaughtered three far better-equipped legions of the Roman army, including the Romans’ prostitutes. The Germans succeeded because they lured Rome into an ambush. And that’s what the Strait of Hormuz is: an ambush.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Iran (and China) have rigged the strait with secret sea-floor weapons, ready to blast American carriers to pieces in a humiliating defeat. If there were any place on Earth where a third-world enemy could defeat the U.S. military, it would be the mountainous terrain of Iran. Indeed, unlike Iraq or Afghanistan, Iran is a giant ambush site, with weapons stashed in caves.

Read more

The classy Cem Özdemir of the Green Party has become Germany’s first state premier (Minister-President) with Turkish roots, a success story for the state of Baden-Württemberg, home of Martin Heidegger and Albert Einstein. From a historical perspective, however, the rise of Turkish-descended individuals to powerful positions in German society carries a very different meaning.

The relevant history of the German state of Württemberg begins with Conrad III of Hohenstaufen, who led the Second Crusade. His campaign to the Holy Land failed when the German army was crushed by the Turkish Seljuks at the Disaster of Dorylaeum in 1147.

Württemberg’s men tried again centuries later through the Tempelgesellschaft, a Protestant group founded in the late 19th century. Though named after the Catholic templar, this group had little to do with the Crusades.

These Christians of the Tempelgesellschaft migrated to Ottoman-ruled Palestine to build rural communities there. The first group of German emigrants arrived in Haifa (now Israel’s main industrial port) in 1868. They established additional colonies near Jaffa, Sarona, Jerusalem, and elsewhere.

The German settlements in Palestine became the most economically successful communities. Local populations were underdeveloped and showed little interest in planned growth.

In 1898, Emperor Wilhelm II visited and met Zionist leader Theodor Herzl to discuss Palestine’s future. From 1903 onward, Germany collaborated with the Ottoman Turks on the famous Berlin-Baghdad railroad, as envisioned by Otto von Bismarck.

Without the world wars, Germany might have dominated the Middle East today, securing cheap energy and trade with the East (India and China). Allied with a friendly Western Russia, this German Reich could have become history’s most powerful empire.

The British Empire could not permit this. Around 1940, Serbian nationalists acting on British orders sabotaged their section of the Berlin-Baghdad railroad, cutting Germany off. It forced Hitler to try to capture Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, for its oil reserves. Failing to do so, Hitler foresaw the German defeat in 1945.

After World War II, the Württemberg Templers soon departed Palestine. By 1948, Britain helped establish modern Israel, based on biblical claims to Jewish ownership of the land. Yet without the infrastructure the Germans first built and left behind, a modern Israel might not exist today.

This is why Cem Özdemir’s rise carries deeper significance than it appears: the roles have reversed. Israel, backed by the USA, might now work with Turkey to influence or dominate Germany rather than the reverse.

In my personal opinion, German Chancellors such as Merkel or Merz are, in fact, Israeli-American puppets, installed to keep the German people subdued long enough for the Turkish-Israeli takeover to succeed. And likewise, Ursula von der Leyen is playing her role to keep Europe buried under needless regulation that are designed to kill European competitiveness.

Without cheap Russian energy (Nordstream 2), Dutch gas fields (filled with cement!), or nuclear power plants, Germany lacks the means to resist a Turkish takeover.

Unless Iran destroys Israel, at which point everything changes again.

Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.